Rotational Force Transmission Mechanism With Torque Buffering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rotational force transmission devices face challenges in preventing gear damage due to excessive loads when detachable units are installed, requiring strong assembly forces and lacking effective torque limiting and buffering mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A rotational force transmission device featuring a transmission mechanism with a first sleeve, a second sleeve, and a coil spring that functions as both a torque limiter and a buffer, allowing the first and second interlockers to disengage under excessive load and providing rotation clearance to prevent gear damage, while sharing components to reduce parts, cost, and size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the urging member is made strong to prevent gear damage under excessive load, then torque limiting capability is improved, but assembly difficulty increases due to requiring large assembly forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear protection capabilityVSAvoidassembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The urging member is divided into a compression spring portion and a torsion spring portion, allowing each segment to contribute differently to the overall function. The compression spring provides gradual urging force that reduces assembly impact, while the torsion spring provides the necessary torque limiting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The compression spring and torsion spring are combined into a single integrated urging member that performs both functions. This merging allows the member to provide both gentle assembly characteristics and strong torque limiting in one component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple components (urging member, gears, etc.) are mounted individually, then assembly flexibility is improved, but assembly complexity increases and requires large assembly forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly flexibilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The urging member is integrated with the gear structure, with the spring portion embedded within the gear body. This reduces the number of separate components that need to be assembled and eliminates the need for large assembly forces while maintaining design flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The compression spring is nested within the urging member structure, with the spring portion housed inside the gear body. This nesting arrangement reduces component count and simplifies assembly while preserving the functional independence of each element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Device complexity

If a single urging member provides both torque limiting and buffering functions, then device complexity is reduced, but the urging member must withstand both compression and twisting forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent countVSAvoidurging member durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The urging member is segmented into distinct functional portions: a compression spring portion for buffering and a torsion spring portion for torque limiting. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific load type while being part of a unified structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The urging member's physical parameters are designed to accommodate both compression and twisting forces. The spring portions are configured with appropriate material properties and geometric parameters to withstand the combined stress conditions while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents gear breakage during detachable unit installation and operation, simplifies assembly by unitizing the urging member, and reduces the risk of damage when the detachable unit is locked, while minimizing component count and size.

Implementation Method 1

a coil spring disposed between the first sleeve and the second sleeve, the coil spring urging the second sleeve toward the ratchet member by restoring force against compression, the coil spring urging the first sleeve and the second sleeve in a direction causing disengagement of the first interlocker and the second interlocker by restoring force against twisting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12019390B2Transmission mechanism, rotational force transmission device, and image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 SHARP KK
  • US12019390B2 patent drawing
  • US12019390B2 patent drawing
  • US12019390B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotational force transmission device includes a transmission mechanism disposed on an input gear, and a ratchet member disposed on an output gear. The transmission mechanism includes a first sleeve having a first interlocker, a second sleeve having a second interlocker that engages with the first interlocker with a rotation clearance in the circumferential direction, and a coil spring disposed between the first and second sleeves. When a drive source is stopped, the second sleeve can idly rotate within the rotation clearance between the first and second interlockers. The first sleeve has a first retainer, and the second sleeve has a second retainer engaging with the first retainer in the axial direction. The first sleeve, the second sleeve, and an urging member are unitized by the engagement of the first and second retainers.