Rotational Helmet Insert for Head Injury Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional protective helmets are ineffective in addressing rotational forces during impacts, leading to serious head injuries despite their ability to absorb translational forces.

Innovation Solution

The helmet's inner carrying device is divided into a shell-side and head-side insert, allowing for rotational movement, with a sliding surface and adjustable densities to counteract rotational acceleration, and features like intermediate layers and connecting means to enhance shock absorption and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the inner carrying device is made as a single fixed piece, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but it cannot reduce rotational acceleration during impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against rotational forcesVSAvoidstructure of inner carrying device
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inner carrying device is divided into a shell-side insert and a head-side insert that can rotate relative to each other about a pivot point. This segmentation allows the system to reduce rotational acceleration during impact while maintaining structural simplicity and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the helmet outer shell is given an oval shape to match the human head, then it provides good fit and comfort, but it inhibits rotational movement during impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational movement capabilityVSAvoidshape of helmet outer shell
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The inner carrying device is segmented into rotatable shell-side and head-side inserts, allowing rotational movement to occur at the pivot point connection rather than requiring changes to the overall oval shape of the helmet shell. This maintains both the head-matching shape and rotational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If a thin slidable shell is introduced between inner and outer shells to reduce rotational acceleration, then protection against rotational forces is improved, but the oval shape of the helmet is inhibited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against rotational forcesVSAvoidoval shape of helmet
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of introducing a thin slidable shell that would interfere with the oval shape, the invention segments the inner carrying device into two inserts connected at a pivot point. This allows rotational movement for protection while preserving the helmet's overall oval shape and aesthetic appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If the inner carrying device is divided into multiple inserts with sliding surfaces, then rotational acceleration is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction of rotational accelerationVSAvoidnumber of inserts and connections
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inner carrying device is divided into exactly two functional inserts (shell-side and head-side) connected by a simple pivot point, providing rotational acceleration reduction without excessive complexity. The segmentation is minimal yet effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A pivot point acts as an intermediary connection between the shell-side and head-side inserts, enabling rotational movement while maintaining structural integrity. This simple intermediary mechanism reduces rotational acceleration without requiring complex multi-component systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly reduces rotational acceleration and prevents head injuries by enabling free rotational movement of the helmet and head, while maintaining a sleek appearance and adapting to varying impact forces.

Implementation Method 1

with the rotational acceleration introduced by the impact being greatly reduced or prevented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

an inner carrying device that absorbs an impact on the head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 3

an inner carrying device that absorbs an impact on the head, which is arranged on the inside of the outer shell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentEP2428129B1Protective helmet; method for preventing or reducing head injury
Publication Date: 2013.04.03 SCHIMPF OLIVER
  • EP2428129B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2428129B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2428129B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A protective helmet (6) and a method for reducing or preventing head injury are proposed, in which a shock-absorbing or shock-absorbing and comfort-providing inner carrying device, which may include liners, comfort pads, protective pads, studded baskets and/or strapped carrying devices (e.g. carrying spiders, carrying straps, headbands or the like), is divided into a shell-side insert (7) and a head-side insert (8), which are rotatable relative to each other (preferably from a certain force application) in at least one direction, so that a sliding surface is present which assumes the function of a rotational surface, so that the rotational acceleration introduced by an impact is greatly reduced or prevented, since the head-side insert (8) and the shell-side insert (7) and thus the head (5) of the wearer and the helmet outer shell are rotatable relative to each other quickly and without hindrance, preferably in all directions.