Rotational Rate Gradient Determination Using Variable Window Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining rotational rate gradients suffer from significant noise and phase shift, particularly at low rotational rates and when transitioning from standstill, due to high sampling frequencies and sparse sensor data.

Innovation Solution

An assembly comprising a rotating element with markings and a sensor, where the evaluation unit calculates rotational rate and gradient using a parameterized time constant T and minimum rotational rate nmin, ensuring accurate gradient determination even with sparse data and reducing noise by using a variable window width for digital filtering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If higher sampling frequencies are used to improve rotational rate gradient determination, then measurement precision is improved, but signal noise increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational rate gradient determination precisionVSAvoidsignal noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of gradient calculation by using a time-dependent gradient function that adapts to the current rotational state. Instead of fixed high-frequency sampling, the system calculates gradients based on variable time intervals between tooth passages, with the gradient formula incorporating the actual measured times ti. This parameter adaptation reduces noise while maintaining precision across different rotational speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If digital filtering is applied to reduce noise in derivative signals, then signal noise is reduced, but phase shift between input signal and derivative increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal noiseVSAvoidphase shift
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing time stamps for each tooth passage event. These time stamps are recorded as the element rotates, and the gradient is subsequently calculated using these pre-captured time values. This approach allows gradient determination without real-time filtering that would cause phase shift, as all necessary data is captured at the moment of tooth passage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If rotational rate is determined at high sampling frequencies, then measurement precision is improved, but the number of time intervals without tooth passages increases, reducing available rotational rate information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational rate determination precisionVSAvoidrotational rate information availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the sampling interval adaptive rather than fixed. The system determines rotational rate using the actual time intervals between consecutive tooth passages, which dynamically adjust based on the current rotational speed. When rotation is slow, larger time intervals are naturally accommodated; when rotation is fast, smaller intervals are captured. This dynamic approach ensures continuous rotational rate information is available across all speed ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If simple difference quotients are used for gradient calculation, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to noise amplification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradient calculation complexityVSAvoidgradient determination precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary element in the form of a time-dependent gradient calculation function that mediates between the raw tooth passage times and the final rotational rate gradient. Instead of directly applying simple difference quotients to noisy signals, the system uses the intermediate time stamps ti of actual tooth passages to calculate gradients through a formulated approach that inherently filters noise while maintaining computational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach minimizes phase shift and noise, providing precise rotational rate gradients with reduced computational noise and improved accuracy, especially during start and stop conditions, by utilizing a parameterized time constant and minimum rotational rate to interpolate gaps and smooth gradients.

Implementation Method 1

An inductive sensor, a magnetic field sensor, or an opto-electronic sensor can be used

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11397191B2Gradient determination for measuring rotational speeds
Publication Date: 2022.07.26 ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG
  • US11397191B2 patent drawing
  • US11397191B2 patent drawing
  • US11397191B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An assembly has a rotating element, a sensor, and an evaluation unit; wherein the element has a number a of markings; wherein the markings pass through a region detected by the sensor in cycles when the element rotates; wherein the sensor is configured to send a signal to the evaluation unit; and wherein the evaluation unit is configured to assign a time ti for when each signal is sent, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to calculate a function m(t) over time t as a measure for a gradient of the rotational rate of the element.