Rotational Stop Dispensing Closure Prevents Cap Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dispensing closures for containers do not effectively prevent removal of the cap from the container while allowing for easy access to the contents, leading to potential misuse or accidental removal.

Innovation Solution

A dispensing closure with a rotational stop mechanism, featuring a recessed squeeze pad and child-resistant locks that limit cap rotation and prevent removal by engaging lug stops on the container finish, ensuring the cap remains attached during use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional dispensing closure is used, then the cap can be easily removed from the container, but this leads to potential misuse or accidental removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of accidental removalVSAvoidaccess to contents
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The closure employs a dynamic rotational stop mechanism that transitions between locked and unlocked states. The stop member rotates relative to the container to engage or disengage from the cap, dynamically changing the closure state from secure (preventing removal) to accessible (allowing controlled opening) based on user action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the rotational parameter of the stop mechanism to control closure state. By limiting rotation to a specific angle (e.g., 90 degrees) and using a child-resistant lock that requires a specific rotational sequence, the system transforms simple cap removal into a controlled parameter-based operation that prevents accidental removal while maintaining ease of intentional access

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a rotational stop mechanism is added to prevent cap removal, then safety is enhanced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of cap removalVSAvoidclosure structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions into integrated components: the stop member serves both as a rotational limiter and a locking element; the child-resistant lock combines stopping, locking, and unlocking functions in a single mechanism; the spout and cap body are integrated to eliminate separate dispensing components. This consolidation reduces overall device complexity while maintaining safety functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The stop member and child-resistant lock perform multiple functions: they limit rotation, prevent cap removal, enable controlled access, and provide a child-resistant barrier. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate safety mechanisms, reducing device complexity while enhancing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8245880B1Closure with rotational stop
Publication Date: 2012.08.21 BERRY PLASTICS CORP
  • US8245880B1 patent drawing
  • US8245880B1 patent drawing
  • US8245880B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dispensing closure with a rotational stop that limits the rotation of the closure and generally prevents removal of the closure from the container. The dispensing closure may include a cap body operably engaging a fitment and a container finish. When the cap body is rotated about the container finish, the interior abutment surface of the recessed squeeze pad engages a lug stop located on the container finish so as to limit the rotation, thereby preventing removal of the cap body from the container finish.