Rotor Apparatus Air Lock for Granular Feeder

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seed drill feeders face challenges in efficiently handling a wide range of seed sizes and feed-out rates while maintaining air-tightness and energy efficiency, particularly in preventing air leakage and optimizing air flow for granular material distribution.

Innovation Solution

A rotor apparatus with an insert part and a rotatable rotor forms an air lock, allowing for negligible air leakage and enabling flexible rotor diameter selection, which can be run at higher speeds for smaller diameters or provide deeper cells for more even filling, accommodating varying seed sizes and rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a rotor substantially takes up the entire axial length of the feeder space with vanes extending over the entire axial length, then air-tightness is improved, but the feeder becomes inflexible in handling different seed sizes and feed-out rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair-tightnessVSAvoidflexibility for different seed sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor is divided into multiple radial vanes that extend only partially along the axial length, creating discrete feeding zones. This segmentation allows the rotor to maintain air-tightness at the axial ends while providing flexibility in the central region for handling different seed sizes and feed-out rates by adjusting rotor speed and vane configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor design enables dynamic adjustment of feed-out rates through variable rotational speed, allowing the same rotor structure to adapt to different seed sizes and feeding requirements without compromising air-tightness when properly positioned in the feeder space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If the rotor diameter is increased to provide deeper cells for more even filling, then material distribution is improved, but the rotor must run at lower speeds reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevenness of material fillingVSAvoidfeed-out rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows dynamic adjustment of rotor speed to optimize the balance between filling evenness and feed-out rate. Larger diameter rotors with deeper cells can operate at lower speeds for even filling, while the same system can increase speed for higher productivity when appropriate, providing operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor design enables changing operational parameters such as rotational speed and cell depth utilization to optimize performance for different seed sizes and feeding requirements, allowing the system to adapt between prioritizing filling evenness or productivity based on specific operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the rotor diameter is decreased to allow higher rotational speeds, then productivity is improved, but the cells become shallower reducing filling evenness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed-out rateVSAvoidevenness of material filling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor apparatus provides dynamic operational flexibility where smaller diameter rotors with shallower cells can operate at higher speeds for maximum productivity, while the system can switch to larger diameter rotors or adjust operational parameters to prioritize filling evenness when required by specific seeding conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If a seal-tight lid is provided on the filler opening to prevent air mixing, then air-tightness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair-tightnessVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The air-tight sealing function is extracted from a separate lid structure and integrated into the rotor itself through its axial end positioning and configuration. The rotor's axial ends are designed to seal against the feeder housing, eliminating the need for a separate seal-tight lid while maintaining air-tightness and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly reduces air leakage, maintains energy efficiency, and ensures flexible handling of different seed sizes and feed rates, achieving minimal air flow loss and optimal material distribution.

Implementation Method 1

The rotor is together with the insert part designed to provide an air lock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir lock:

Implementation Method 2

which when viewed in an axial direction, inclines downward to the rotor space, so that material which is fed from, for example a seed container, will slide down toward the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP3413699B1Rotor assembly, method, feeder device and agricultural implement for feeding granular or powder material
Publication Date: 2022.11.02 VAEDERSTAD HOLDING AB
  • EP3413699B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3413699B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3b
  • EP3413699B1 patent drawingFigure 3c~3e

AI summary

The present document discloses a rotor apparatus (20) for feeding granular or powdered material in an agricultural implement, the rotor apparatus being designed to be received in a partially cylindrical feeder space of a feeder device for volumetric feeding. The rotor apparatus (20) comprises an insert part (21 ), which in size and shape is adapted to be inserted into the feeder space and to substantially prevent air from passing the insert part when this is inserted into the feeder space, and a rotor (22), which is rotatable relative to the insert part. The insert part (21 ) defines a rotor space (218), in which the rotor (22) is rotatable, and the rotor is together with the insert part designed to provide an air lock. The insert part (21 ) comprises a wall portion (214, 215) interacting with the rotor and located radially outside the radially outermost portion of the rotor.