Permanent Magnet Rotor Anisotropy Control for Torque Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Permanent magnet rotators face challenges in reducing cogging torque while maintaining high torque density, especially with anisotropic magnetic poles of small thickness, which are difficult to segment and manufacture with high precision, leading to increased noise and vibration in motors.

Innovation Solution

A permanent magnet rotator with continuous direction control for anisotropy is achieved by modifying magnetic poles to have a sinusoidal distribution of anisotropy direction with respect to the mechanical angle, using rare-earth magnet particles and a coupling agent to increase energy density and torque density without increasing cogging torque, through precise control of shear stress and magnetizing field.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the energy density (BH) max of the magnet is increased to increase torque density, then the torque density increases, but the cogging torque increases causing increased vibration and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque densityVSAvoidcogging torque
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the thickness of magnetic poles across different locations. The magnetic pole thickness is designed to be maximum at the center and minimum at both ends, creating a thickness deviation pattern. This local variation in thickness allows the airgap magnetic flux density distribution to approach sinusoidal wave shape, thereby reducing cogging torque while maintaining high torque density through the use of high energy density magnet materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the thickness of magnetic poles is reduced to minimize cogging torque, then the cogging torque decreases, but the torque density decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecogging torqueVSAvoidtorque density
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly reducing magnetic pole thickness, the patent applies local quality by creating a non-uniform thickness distribution. The magnetic poles have maximum thickness at the center and minimum thickness at the ends, which allows the overall torque density to be maintained while the local flux distribution is optimized to reduce cogging torque. This localized thickness variation resolves the contradiction between reducing cogging torque and maintaining torque density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If magnetic poles are segmented to control anisotropy direction, then the direction control precision improves, but the manufacturing difficulty increases due to fragile mechanical properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirection control precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing magnetic poles into multiple sections along the circumferential direction. Each segmented magnetic pole can have independently controlled anisotropy direction, allowing precise control of the magnetic flux distribution. This segmentation enables the realization of sinusoidal airgap flux density distribution while maintaining manufacturability through a systematic division of the magnetic pole structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining magnetically anisotropic materials with different anisotropy directions in each segmented region. This composite structure allows each segment to contribute differently to the overall magnetic field distribution, achieving precise direction control while the composite nature provides mechanical support to mitigate fragility issues during manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for a significant increase in torque density while reducing cogging torque, enhancing motor performance, power efficiency, and resource utilization in small motors used in home appliances and information devices.

Implementation Method 1

uses a magnet having the ability to attract or repel other magnetic materials and the ability to permanently generate a static magnetic field without using external energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

using rare-earth magnet particles and a coupling agent to increase energy density and torque density

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

through precise control of shear stress and magnetizing field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 4

effective magnetization M is left even after removal of an external magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetization: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP1956698B1Permanent magnet rotor and motor using the same
Publication Date: 2018.03.07 PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP
  • EP1956698B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP1956698B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP1956698B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A motor generally has a contradictory relation between decrease of cogging torque and increase of torque density. To overcome this problem, continuous direction control is provided for anisotropy with modification of magnetic poles so that the average absolute value of differences between Mθ and 90×sin[φ{2π/(360/p)}] is set to be 3° or less, where Mθ is a direction of anisotropy with respect to a radial tangent line of a magnetic pole plane, φ is a mechanical angle, and p is the number of pole pairs.