Multi-stage Rotor Assembly Phase Optimization for Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for studying and controlling vibration in aero-engine rotors lack explicit geometry parameter optimization and fail to establish a high-speed vibration response measurement model, leading to unoptimized performance due to unbalanced excitations and stiffness parameters.

Innovation Solution

A stage-by-stage measurement, regulation, and distribution method for dynamic characteristics of multi-stage components using multi-biased error synchronous compensation, which includes establishing a five-parameter circular contour measurement model, determining eccentricity errors, and optimizing assembly phases to adjust rotor speed and balance, thereby optimizing high-speed response parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If single-objective coaxiality optimization is performed alone without considering rotation errors around X and Y axes, then the coaxiality model is simplified, but the high-speed vibration response cannot be optimized due to incomplete error compensation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoaxiality model complexityVSAvoidhigh-speed vibration response optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the error compensation process into multiple independent stages (coarse adjustment stage and fine adjustment stage), each handling specific error components. The coarse stage addresses major coaxiality deviations, while the fine stage compensates for high-speed vibration responses, allowing complex multi-axis errors to be managed through sequential simplified operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary coarse adjustment of coaxiality before high-speed rotation testing. By pre-compensating for major geometric errors and misalignments in the assembly process, the system reduces the magnitude of errors that would otherwise manifest during high-speed operation, enabling more effective optimization of vibration response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If multi-stage rotor assembly is performed without stage-by-stage error compensation, then the assembly process is simpler, but cumulative measurement errors propagate and amplify leading to unoptimized high-speed response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly process efficiencyVSAvoidhigh-speed response optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary error measurement and compensation at each assembly stage before proceeding to the next stage. By measuring and correcting errors in the first stage rotor before assembling the second stage, the system prevents cumulative error propagation while maintaining a systematic assembly workflow that does not significantly impact productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where measurement data from each assembly stage is used to adjust and optimize the next stage. The measurement results from previous stages inform the compensation actions in subsequent stages, creating a closed-loop control system that continuously optimizes the multi-stage rotor assembly without requiring complete disassembly or rework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive five-parameter measurement model is used including all error sources, then measurement precision is improved, but the complexity of error compensation and optimization increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeccentricity error estimationVSAvoiderror compensation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the comprehensive five-parameter measurement model into two functional groups: geometric parameters (coaxiality, circularity) handled in the coarse adjustment stage, and dynamic parameters (eccentricity, unbalance) handled in the fine adjustment stage. This segmentation allows each stage to focus on specific parameters, reducing the apparent complexity while maintaining comprehensive measurement capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static geometric measurement to dynamic measurement as rotor speed increases. The measurement system adapts its focus based on operating conditions: geometric parameters dominate at low speeds, while dynamic parameters become more significant at high speeds. This dynamic approach allows the system to manage complexity by emphasizing different parameter sets at different operational phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11385120B2Stage-by-stage measurement, regulation and distribution method for dynamic characteristics of multi-stage components of large-scale high-speed rotary equipment based on multi-biased error synchronous compensation
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 HARBIN INST OF TECH
  • US11385120B2 patent drawing
  • US11385120B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides a stage-by-stage measurement, regulation and distribution method for dynamic characteristics of multi-stage components of large-scale high-speed rotary equipment. Firstly, a single-stage rotor circular contour measurement model is established, and the circular contour measurement model is simplified by using a distance from an ith sampling point of an ellipse to a geometry center to obtain a simplified circular contour measurement model. Then, actually measured circular contour data is taken into the simplified circular contour measurement model to determine a relationship between dynamic response parameters after rotor assembly and eccentricity errors as well as the amount of unbalance of all stages of rotors. Finally, a rotor speed is set according to the relationship between the dynamic response parameters after rotor assembly and the eccentricity errors as well as the amount of unbalance of all stages of rotors to obtain a critical speed parameter objective function.