Rotor Axis Deviation Calculation via End Face Runout

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for calculating axis deviation in aero-engine rotor assembly, such as the fitting plane method and actual rotary centerline method, face challenges in accuracy due to errors in fitting planes with irregular topography and limited adaptability to China's manufacturing level, particularly in ensuring concentricity and reducing part wear and time costs.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates axis deviation based on end face runout measurement of flange joint surfaces before assembly, using a roundness meter to determine initial contact points and relative deviation matrices, which are then multiplied to obtain a total deviation matrix for optimizing assembly phases, thereby improving concentricity and reducing reassembly needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fitting plane method is used to calculate assembly stacking deviation, then the processing algorithm is simple and can grasp the morphological characteristics of two joint surfaces as a whole, but the accuracy of the predicted axis deviation is difficult to be guaranteed due to large error between the fitting plane and source data for surfaces with double high points or irregular topography

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing algorithm complexityVSAvoidaxis deviation prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the joint surface into multiple measurement points and identifies specific contact point regions rather than using a unified fitting plane for the entire surface. This segmentation allows accurate representation of irregular topography with double high points while maintaining manageable computational complexity through localized analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different analysis approaches to different regions of the joint surface, specifically identifying and analyzing contact point regions with distinct topographic features (double high points) separately from other areas. This local quality approach ensures accurate axis deviation prediction for critical regions while maintaining overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If actual rotary centerline method is used to predict axis deviation, then the prediction accuracy is high, but it is difficult to adapt to the production and assembly process of aero-engine rotors in China due to restricted advanced part and component manufacturing level and widespread part out-of-tolerance phenomenon

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxis deviation prediction accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to Chinese manufacturing level
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the measurement and analysis parameters to accommodate out-of-tolerance parts by focusing on relative runout measurements between mating surfaces rather than absolute precision requirements. This parameter change allows the method to achieve sufficient accuracy even when individual parts exceed traditional tolerance specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary measurement and analysis of joint surface topography before assembly to identify contact point characteristics and predict axis deviation in advance. This preliminary action allows for pre-adjustment of assembly parameters, making the method adaptable to varying manufacturing quality levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If trial-and-error assembly is used to ensure concentricity, then the assembly concentricity can be achieved, but the time and labor cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly concentricityVSAvoidassembly time and labor cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary measurement of joint surface runout and calculation of assembly stacking deviation before actual assembly. This preliminary action provides predictive information about axis deviation, allowing operators to pre-adjust assembly parameters and avoid repeated trial-and-error attempts, thereby significantly reducing assembly time and labor cost while ensuring concentricity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11093582B2Method for calculating axis deviation of rotor assembly based on end face runout measurement
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 DALIAN UNIV OF TECH
  • US11093582B2 patent drawing
  • US11093582B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for calculating axis deviation of rotor assembly based on end face runout measurement comprises three parts: calculation of three contact points, a triangle judgment criterion and a homogeneous coordinate transformation algorithm of a deviation matrix. Based on the measured end face runout data in production practice, the method realizes the prediction of axis deviation before assembly, improves the concentricity of rotors after assembly, also greatly increases the one-time acceptance rate of assembly and has important practical guiding significance for axis prediction as well as assembly phase adjustment and optimization in the assembly process of aero-engine rotor pieces.