Gas Turbine Rotor Blade Cooling Aperture Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cooling methods for gas turbine engine rotor blades, particularly high pressure turbine blades, require significant amounts of coolant air, which reduces engine efficiency and is not effectively distributed for optimal heat transfer, especially at the leading and trailing edges where cooling is most challenging.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates aerofoils with non-linear centerlines for coolant apertures, featuring elliptical entries and circular or elliptical exits, angled to direct coolant flows perpendicularly onto the chamber walls, enhancing the pressure ratio and heat transfer efficiency while minimizing coolant usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional cooling methods (internal convection and external films) are used for rotor blades, then cooling coverage is provided, but coolant air consumption is excessive and engine efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade temperature controlVSAvoidengine efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is segmented into multiple functional zones: impingement cooling zones with arrays of holes for intense localized cooling, and serpentine passage zones for distributed cooling. This segmentation allows different cooling methods to be applied to different blade regions, optimizing coolant usage while maintaining effective temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies impingement cooling with high-velocity jets at specific locations (leading edges, trailing edges, and suction surfaces) where heat flux is highest, while using serpentine passages in other regions. This local quality approach concentrates cooling resources where most needed, reducing overall coolant consumption while maintaining blade integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Temperature

If separate chambers or cavities with impingement air are configured for leading and trailing edges, then cooling is provided to difficult-to-cool areas, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleading and trailing edge temperatureVSAvoidcooling structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the impingement cooling function and serpentine passage cooling into a single integrated cooling structure within the blade. The impingement holes and serpentine passages share common coolant supply channels and are structurally integrated, eliminating the need for separate chambers and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining effective cooling of leading and trailing edges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If higher pressure ratios across impingement holes are used to improve cooling effectiveness, then heat transfer improves, but feed pressure requirements increase and coolant leakage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoidcoolant leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs arrays of small-diameter impingement holes that create high-velocity dynamic jets from moderate pressure differentials. The dynamic nature of these jets provides intense cooling without requiring excessively high feed pressures, thereby reducing coolant leakage while maintaining high cooling effectiveness through the kinetic energy of the impingement flows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases the impingement pressure ratio without increasing feed pressure, achieving focused heat transfer and improved cooling effectiveness, leading to reduced aerofoil leading edge temperatures and increased durability, thus allowing higher gas temperatures and improved engine efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of feed apertures is defined in the divider wall to supply the coolant to impinge on the chamber wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpingement cooling:

Implementation Method 2

achieving focused heat transfer and improved cooling effectiveness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer:

Implementation Method 3

internal convection and external films have been utilised as the primary methods for cooling rotor blades

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection cooling: Convection

Implementation Method 4

the coolant air temperature will be in the order of 700 to 1,000 K whilst the gas temperature in the high pressure turbine stage will be in excess of 2,100 K

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat absorption:

Data Source

PatentUS8657576B2Rotor blade
Publication Date: 2014.02.25 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US8657576B2 patent drawing
  • US8657576B2 patent drawing
  • US8657576B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Cooling within aerofoils (30, 47, 67, 87) is a requirement in order that the materials from which the aerofoil (30, 47, 67, 87) is created can remain within acceptable operational parameters. Traditionally static pressure as well as enhanced dynamic pressure impingement flows have been utilized but there are problems with regard to achieving a necessary over pressure to avoid hot gas ingestion or reduced cooling effect. It will be appreciated that fluid flows and in particular coolant fluid flows must be used most appropriately in order to maintain operational efficiency. By providing a plurality of feed apertures (41, 61, 81) which are shaped to have an entry portion (51, 71, 91) which is generally elliptical and an exit portion (52, 72, 92) it is possible to grab and turn a proportion of a feed flow (44, 64, 84) for substantially perpendicular or other angular presentation to an opposed surface of a cooling chamber (42, 62, 82) within which cooling is required.