Variable Pitch Rotor Blade Dual Support Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Standard rotor blades in aircraft propulsion systems face challenges in maintaining pitch control due to substantial centrifugal and aerodynamic forces, leading to potential overspeed conditions and blade loss, especially in variable pitch systems without adequate countermeasures.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates dual support members attached to the airfoil of rotor blades, allowing for variable pitch control through a hub assembly with a collector ring and bearing mechanism, reducing the need for counterweights and enhancing structural integrity with lightweight materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If standard rotor blade configurations with ball/roller bearing and flex member are used, then pitch change capability is achieved, but the mechanism becomes extremely heavy to accommodate centrifugal forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepitch change capabilityVSAvoidretention mechanism weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor blade is divided into two independent support members (first and second support members) attached at different locations on the airfoil. Each support member independently handles portion of the centrifugal and aerodynamic loads, allowing the use of lighter retention mechanisms compared to a single heavy mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates the need for counterweights by using the dual support member configuration that naturally balances the centrifugal forces through proper geometric arrangement and attachment points, reducing the overall weight of the retention system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Strength

If heavy retention mechanisms are used to accommodate centrifugal forces, then structural integrity is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidretention mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retention system is segmented into two separate support members with their own retention mechanisms, allowing each component to be optimized for its specific load conditions rather than requiring a single overly complex heavy-duty mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each support member is designed with specific geometric characteristics and attachment configurations tailored to the local stress conditions at its attachment point on the airfoil, optimizing structural integrity while minimizing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If pitch control system exerts force to overcome total twisting moment, then blade pitch stability is maintained, but the system requires substantial control forces that can lead to overspeed conditions during malfunction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade pitch stabilityVSAvoidoverspeed protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dual support members are positioned asymmetrically on the airfoil structure, creating an inherent mechanical balance that reduces the total twisting moment requiring active control, thereby reducing the risk of overspeed during control system malfunction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The geometric arrangement of the two support members creates a natural balancing effect that counteracts the centrifugal twisting moment, reducing the burden on the pitch control system and providing inherent protection against overspeed conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Stability of the object's composition

If counterweights are added to prevent pitch tendencies, then pitch control is improved, but the rotor blade weight increases and loading on bearings increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepitch controlVSAvoidrotor blade weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional counterweights with a dual support member configuration that achieves pitch stability through geometric arrangement and load distribution, eliminating the need for additional counterweight mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The support members are designed with specific geometric parameters and attachment configurations that inherently balance the centrifugal forces, achieving pitch control without adding mass through counterweights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration efficiently balances high centrifugal forces, reduces the risk of overspeed and blade loss, and allows for controlled pitch adjustments to optimize thrust and efficiency across varying operating conditions, eliminating the need for counterweights and minimizing mechanical stress.

Implementation Method 1

allow pitch change of the blade with relatively low friction between components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

accommodate the substantial centrifugal forces exerted on the mechanisms during operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 3

The CTM, which is typically the most substantial of the forces, originates from a non-symmetrical mass distribution of an airfoil of a rotor blade about a pitch change axis of the airfoil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal twisting moment: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 4

The ATM is caused when the effective center of pressure on each section of an airfoil of a rotor blade is forward or aft of the pitch change axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic twisting moment: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 5

the pitch control system of a typical rotor blade device exerts a torsional load in the direction of increased pitch to hold the blade pitch constant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsional load: Torque

Implementation Method 6

The FTM resists turning motion and develops in retention bearings that support the rotor blade due to high centrifugal loads acting on the bearings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20090092493A1Variable pitch rotor blade with double flexible retention elements
Publication Date: 2009.04.09 ROTATING COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US20090092493A1 patent drawing
  • US20090092493A1 patent drawing
  • US20090092493A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A propulsive thrust device for an engine includes a rotor blade and a hub assembly on which the rotor blade is mounted. The rotor blade comprises an airfoil and at least two support members. A propeller thrust device includes a rotor blade, a central hub at which the rotor blade centrifugal load is supported, and an outer hub supporting a control mechanism mechanically connected to the rotor blade and controllable to vary the pitch of the rotor blade on the central hub. A rotor blade for an aircraft engine or in a separate ducted fan housing driven by a powered shaft or gearbox output shaft includes an airfoil and first and second support members attached to the airfoil. An extended arm or portion of the structure at the root of the airfoil of each blade is attached to a controllable mechanism that can vary the pitch of all blades simultaneously.