Wind Turbine Rotor Blade Thorned Trailing Edge for Hub Flow Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large wind turbine rotor blades face challenges with high weight, complex transportation, and noise emissions due to their size and aerodynamic design, particularly in the hub region where flow separation and turbulence occur, limiting lift characteristics and increasing noise levels.

Innovation Solution

The rotor blade design incorporates a thickness profile with thorn-like extensions at the trailing edge in the hub region, featuring a rose thorn profile with varying thickness and serrations, which reduces profile depth while maintaining lift characteristics and stabilizing vortex formation to minimize noise and enhance aerodynamics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the rotor blade diameter is increased to ensure constant electricity production in light wind regions, then the aerodynamic performance is improved, but the rotor blade weight increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectricity productionVSAvoid rotor blade weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor blade is divided into multiple sections (root section, intermediate section, tip section) with different profile characteristics. The hub region has a modified thickness profile with reduced profile depth compared to the central and tip regions, allowing optimization of each section for its specific functional requirements while reducing overall weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The thickness profile is locally adapted in the hub region with a reduced profile depth and modified trailing edge geometry, while the central and tip regions maintain standard airfoil profiles. This local modification optimizes the hub region for connection purposes and reduces weight without compromising the aerodynamic performance of the main lifting sections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the rotor blade diameter is increased to ensure constant electricity production in light wind regions, then the aerodynamic performance is improved, but the transport complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectricity productionVSAvoidtransport complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor blade is designed as a multi-section structure with a parting point in the intermediate region, enabling division into transportable segments. The hub region with its reduced profile depth facilitates connection of blade sections, simplifying transport logistics while maintaining the large diameter needed for light wind performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a two-part rotor blade design is implemented to simplify transport, then the transportability is improved, but the stability and load-bearing capacity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetransportabilityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The connection region in the hub area is designed with a specific modified thickness profile and reduced profile depth, creating an optimized junction zone that enhances the strength and stability of the connection between blade sections. This local structural enhancement compensates for the potential weakness introduced by the parting point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The blade design incorporates pre-reinforced connection regions with modified geometry and enhanced structural features at the parting point, preparing the connection zones in advance to withstand operational loads and maintain stability during assembly and operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Weight of moving object

If the profile depth is reduced in the hub region, then the weight is reduced, but the lift characteristics deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve rotor blade weightVSAvoidlift
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The hub region with reduced profile depth is positioned where lift generation is less critical compared to the central and tip regions. The modified thickness profile in this specific location reduces weight while the standard airfoil profiles in the main lifting sections preserve the overall lift characteristics of the rotor blade

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Ease of manufacture

If a flat back profile with truncated trailing edge is used in the hub region, then the manufacturing is simplified, but the flow separation and turbulence increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemanufacturingVSAvoidflow separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flat back profile with truncated trailing edge is applied specifically in the hub region where aerodynamic performance is less critical. This simplified geometry facilitates manufacturing and connection operations, while the standard airfoil profiles with proper trailing edge geometry in the central and tip regions maintain smooth flow characteristics and minimize turbulence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor blade employs different profile geometries in different regions: the simplified flat back profile in the hub section and conventional airfoil profiles in the aerodynamically critical sections. This segmentation allows each region to be optimized for its specific function while minimizing overall harmful effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves reduced noise emissions, improved lift values, and increased effective profile depth, allowing for lighter and more transportable rotor blades with efficient energy extraction from wind, even in turbulent conditions.

Implementation Method 1

stabilizing vortex formation to minimize noise and enhance aerodynamics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex formation: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

flow separation and turbulence occur

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

maintaining lift characteristics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS10968885B2Rotor blade of a wind turbine and a wind turbine
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 WOBBEN PROPERTIES GMBH
  • US10968885B2 patent drawing
  • US10968885B2 patent drawing
  • US10968885B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor blade having a suction side and a pressure side for a wind power installation, comprising: a rotor blade root of a hub region for the attachment of the rotor blade to a rotor hub, and a rotor blade tip arranged toward that side of a tip region which is averted from the rotor blade root. In the region of the hub region, the rotor blade has, at least in part, a thickness profile which has a thorn-like extension at its trailing edge, wherein, in the region of the hub region, the thickness profile has, at least in part, a first thorn-like extension at the trailing edge at the suction side, and a second thorn-like extension at the trailing edge at the pressure side, and, in the region of the hub region, the thickness profile has, at least in part, a flow stabilizer and/or a vortex generator on the suction and/or pressure side.