Wind Turbine Rotor Blade Profile for Flow Separation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rotor blades for wind power systems face inefficiencies due to flow separation and boundary layer issues, particularly near the hub, leading to reduced power output and mechanical stress, especially in stochastic wind conditions.

Innovation Solution

A rotor blade profile with increased thickness in the inner region, resembling a trapezoidal shape, is designed with maximum profile thickness at the rotor blade mount, optimizing aerodynamic performance by minimizing flow separation and hysteresis effects, and featuring a concave pressure side and straight suction side to enhance lift and reduce noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the rotor blade uses a conventional profile design, then the manufacturing is simpler, but the power output and aerodynamic efficiency are reduced due to flow separation and boundary layer issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidprofile complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor blade profile implements different geometric characteristics in different regions: the inner region (first region) has increased thickness with a concave pressure side and straight suction side to minimize flow separation, while the outer region maintains conventional aerodynamic shaping. This local differentiation optimizes performance in each region without requiring complete redesign of the entire blade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor blade profile is divided into distinct regions: a first region near the hub with increased thickness and specific camber characteristics, and a second region extending to the tip with conventional profile geometry. This segmentation allows each region to be optimized independently for its specific operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Power

If the rotor blade profile thickness is increased in the inner region, then flow separation is minimized and power output increases, but the structural weight and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidrotor blade weight
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The increased profile thickness is applied only in the first region (inner region) where flow separation is most problematic, while the second region (outer region) maintains conventional thinner profile geometry. This localized approach minimizes the weight penalty while maximizing the aerodynamic benefit where it is most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Power

If the rotor blade operates at higher wind velocities, then more power is generated, but mechanical stress and the risk of damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidmechanical stress
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The increased thickness in the inner region and optimized camber characteristics create more favorable pressure distributions that reduce flow separation and turbulence even before high-stress conditions occur. This preliminary optimization of flow patterns reduces the buildup of mechanical stress during normal operation, preventing stress accumulation that would occur during extreme events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Reliability

If the rotor blade surface area exposed to wind is decreased, then mechanical damage is protected against, but power output and efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from damageVSAvoidpower output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the rotor blade profile, specifically increasing the thickness in the inner region and optimizing the camber distribution. These parameter changes improve the aerodynamic efficiency per unit area, allowing the blade to generate more power from the same swept area, thereby reducing the need to decrease surface area for protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly increases power output by up to 10% at lower wind velocities, allowing the system to reach nominal power more quickly, reduces mechanical stress, and minimizes boundary layer separation, resulting in improved efficiency and reduced noise emission.

Implementation Method 1

The rotor blade is designed with a specific profile geometry including camber, thickness distribution, and leading edge radius to optimize aerodynamic performance and maximize lift generation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The patent addresses flow separation and boundary layer issues that occur in conventional rotor blade designs, particularly in the inner region near the hub, by optimizing the profile geometry to maintain attached flow and minimize turbulence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Data Source

PatentUS7946803B2Rotor blade for a wind power system
Publication Date: 2011.05.24 WOBBEN ALOYS
  • US7946803B2 patent drawing
  • US7946803B2 patent drawing
  • US7946803B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention pertains to a rotor blade for a wind power system as well as a wind power system. The present invention is based on the objective of disclosing a rotor blade with a rotor blade profile and a corresponding wind power system that make it possible to improve the efficiency in comparison with arrangements known thus far. In the proposed rotor blade for a wind power system, the position of maximum thickness of the rotor blade lies approximately between 15% and 40%, preferably between 23% and 28%, and the maximum profile thickness lies approximately between 20% and 45%, preferably between 32% and 36%.