Wind Turbine Rotor Blade Living Hinge Spoiler

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As wind turbine rotor blades increase in size, they impose higher loads on other components due to increased mass and aerodynamic loads, which can exceed the load-bearing capabilities, especially in high-speed wind conditions, and existing spoiler systems are either permanently designed or complex to deploy actively.

Innovation Solution

A wind turbine rotor blade with an actuatable spoiler featuring a living hinge mechanism that can pivot between a recessed and elevated position to separate airflow, reducing lift and loads, using a flexible material and an actuator for controlled deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If rotor blade size is increased to improve energy production, then energy production increases, but loads on blade components exceed load-bearing capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy productionVSAvoidload-bearing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The spoiler is designed to be dynamically deployable between a flush position (for normal operation) and a deployed position (for load reduction). This dynamic capability allows the blade to maintain high energy production during normal conditions while reducing loads during high-wind conditions, resolving the contradiction between productivity and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The living hinge mechanism allows the spoiler to change its position parameter dynamically. By changing the spoiler's position from flush to deployed, the aerodynamic parameters (lift and drag) are modified to reduce loads on the blade components, enabling the blade to handle larger sizes without exceeding load-bearing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If permanent spoilers are used to reduce lift and loads, then loads are reduced, but lift generation is reduced regardless of operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload reductionVSAvoidlift generation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The spoiler transitions from a permanent static feature to a dynamic movable feature. It remains in a flush position during normal operation to maintain optimal lift generation for energy production, and only deploys when needed to reduce loads, thus resolving the contradiction between load reduction and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spoiler operates periodically rather than continuously - deployed during high-wind conditions when load reduction is needed, and retracted during normal conditions when lift generation is prioritized. This periodic action allows the system to optimize for different objectives at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If active spoilers with electrically operated clutch are used to control overspeed, then overspeed control is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverspeed controlVSAvoidactuator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The living hinge mechanism enables the spoiler to deploy and retract using aerodynamic forces and spring tension without requiring complex electrical actuators or clutch mechanisms. The system serves itself by using the airflow and elastic properties of the living hinge to achieve the desired spoiler movement, significantly reducing device complexity while maintaining overspeed control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The complex electrical-mechanical system (electrically operated clutch, ropes, springs) is replaced with a simpler elastic-mechanical system based on the living hinge. The living hinge's inherent elasticity provides the necessary mechanical advantage and movement control without requiring additional actuators, cables, or electrical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If spring-based spoiler deployment is used to open spoiler in overspeed, then spoiler deployment is achieved, but spring size and strength must be sufficient to hold spoiler open against airflow force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespoiler deploymentVSAvoidspring strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The living hinge structure itself provides the elastic restoring force needed for spoiler deployment and retraction. The aerodynamic forces during operation naturally work with the living hinge's elasticity to achieve spoiler movement, eliminating the need for oversized springs while maintaining reliable deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The material properties and geometric parameters of the living hinge are optimized to provide sufficient elastic force for spoiler deployment without requiring large or strong springs. By changing the hinge's thickness, material composition, or geometry, the system achieves the necessary force with a compact, lightweight structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a simple, cost-effective means to dynamically adjust lift and loads on the rotor blade, enhancing operational safety and efficiency by reducing loads during high-speed conditions without affecting performance in low-speed conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The fixed end is connected to the outer surface so as to enable a hinge action. In one embodiment, the hinge action may be a living hinge.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlexibility: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

surface features, such as spoilers, are known that may be utilized to separate the flow of air from the outer surface of a rotor blade, thereby reducing the lift generated by the blade and reducing the loads acting on the blade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Data Source

PatentUS9267491B2Wind turbine rotor blade having a spoiler
Publication Date: 2016.02.23 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US9267491B2 patent drawing
  • US9267491B2 patent drawing
  • US9267491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor blade for a wind turbine is disclosed. The rotor blade may generally include a shell having a pressure side and a suction side. The shell may define an outer surface along the pressure and suction sides over which an airflow travels. The rotor blade may also include a spoiler having a fixed end and a free end. The fixed end is connected to the outer surface so as to enable a hinge action, such as a living hinge. The free end includes a top flange and a bottom flange configured to engage opposite sides of the shell and is pivotal relative to the fixed end between a recessed position and an elevated position. The free end has a range of motion limited by contact of the top flange and the bottom flange with the shell. Further, the spoiler is configured to separate the airflow from the outer surface when the spoiler is in the elevated position.