Gas Turbine Rotor Blade Tip Vortex Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas turbine engine efficiency is reduced due to flow disturbances caused by leakage airflows through the tip clearance gap, with existing solutions either failing to adequately address the issue or increasing rotor mass, which limits operational speeds and temperatures.

Innovation Solution

The rotor blade design features a unique airfoil configuration with varying stagger and chord angles, particularly in the tip region, which alters the local pressure distribution to minimize leakage mixing losses without altering the leakage flow amount.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the clearance gap is decreased by reducing tolerances, then leakage airflow is reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase and thermal/centrifugal expansion interference occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage mixing lossesVSAvoidclearance gap tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by modifying only the tip region of the airfoil with a specific geometry (rounded or flattened tip, or tip extension) while keeping the rest of the airfoil design unchanged. This localized modification alters the pressure distribution specifically at the tip to reduce leakage flow effects without requiring tight tolerances across the entire blade assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes geometric parameters of the airfoil tip region, such as tip radius, tip chord length, or tip shape configuration. These parameter changes modify the local pressure distribution and flow characteristics to reduce leakage mixing losses without affecting the overall clearance gap dimensions or requiring reduced tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If a shroud is attached to the tips of the rotor blades, then vortex induced losses are reduced, but rotor mass increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevortex induced lossesVSAvoidrotor mass
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the tip leakage control function from the separate shroud component and integrates it directly into the airfoil tip geometry itself. By incorporating leakage-reducing features (such as rounded tips, flattened tips, or tip extensions) as part of the basic airfoil structure, the solution eliminates the need for additional shroud components while maintaining the benefit of reduced vortex induced losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the tip leakage control function with the airfoil structure by integrating tip modification features directly into the airfoil design. This consolidation combines the structural airfoil function with the flow control function in a single integrated component, eliminating the need for separate shroud attachments and reducing overall rotor mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of energy

If the airfoil tip geometry is modified to alter pressure distribution, then leakage mixing losses are reduced, but airfoil design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage mixing lossesVSAvoidairfoil design
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by modifying only the tip region of the airfoil with specific geometric features (rounded tip, flattened tip, or tip extension) while keeping the rest of the airfoil design simple and conventional. This localized approach reduces leakage mixing losses through targeted pressure distribution modification without requiring complex changes to the overall airfoil geometry or design methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly reduces mixing losses, leading to higher efficiency in gas turbine engines by optimizing airflow characteristics in the tip region.

Implementation Method 1

alters the local pressure distribution to minimize leakage mixing losses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure distribution: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a stagnation point is formed near the leading edge of the airfoil. A stagnation point may be defined as a point in a flow field where velocity of the airflow is approximately zero. At the stagnation point, the airflow separates into a pressure side airflow and a suction side airflow.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

This leakage airflow mixes with the suction side airflow forming a vortex.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex formation: Vortex Ring

Data Source

PatentEP2333242B1Tip vortex control on a rotor blade for a gas turbine engine
Publication Date: 2015.06.17 UNITED TECH CORP
  • EP2333242B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2333242B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP2333242B1 patent drawingFigure 5A~7

AI summary

A rotor blade (32) for a gas turbine engine includes an attachment (34) and an airfoil (36). The airfoil (36)has a stagger angle (Φ), a base region (50), a transition region (52) and a tip regions (54). The stagger angle (Φ) changes as the airfoil (36) extends between the attachment (34) and a tip (46). The base region (50) is disposed adjacent to the attachment (34). The transition region (52) is located between the base (50) and the tip (54) regions. A rate of the change of the stagger angle (Φ) in the transition region (52) is greater than a rate of the change of the stagger angle (Φ) in the base region (50). The rate of the change of the stagger angle (Φ) in the transition region (52) is greater than a rate of change of the stagger angle in the tip region (54).