Pump Motor Rotor Can Damping for Thinner High-Efficiency Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The efficiency of wet-running electric motors in pump units is compromised by the can separating the stator and rotor, which requires a greater distance between them, leading to reduced motor efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A pump unit design that incorporates axial and radial damping parts between the rotor can and the surrounding support structure, allowing for a reduced thickness of the rotor can without transferring vibrations to the surrounding pump structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the can thickness is reduced to increase motor efficiency, then the gap between rotor and stator can be reduced improving efficiency, but vibrations occur in the rotor can which transfer to the surrounding support structure causing noise and potential damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor efficiencyVSAvoidvibrations and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a damping part as an intermediary element between the rotor can and the support structure. This damping part absorbs and dissipates vibrations, preventing them from transferring to the support structure while allowing the rotor can to be made thinner for improved motor efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The damping part is pre-installed between the rotor can and the support structure to provide cushioning against vibrations before they can cause harm. This beforehand protection allows the system to operate with thinner can walls without risking vibration-related damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Loss of energy

If the can thickness is reduced to improve motor efficiency, then the gap between rotor and stator decreases, but the structural strength and stability of the rotor can are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor efficiencyVSAvoidrotor can strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The damping part serves as a mediator that compensates for the reduced structural strength of the thinner rotor can. By absorbing vibrations and reducing stress concentrations, the damping part allows the rotor can to maintain sufficient strength despite the reduced wall thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite structure where the rotor can (metallic material) is combined with the damping part (elastomeric or polymeric material). This composite approach allows the thin-walled rotor can to achieve the necessary mechanical strength and vibration resistance through the combined properties of both materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Loss of energy

If damping parts are added to reduce vibrations and noise, then motor efficiency can be improved by reducing can thickness, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The damping part is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it provides vibration damping, noise reduction, and mechanical support for the rotor can. This multi-functionality justifies the addition of the component by delivering multiple benefits from a single element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The damping part integrates several functions into a single component, merging vibration isolation, noise damping, and structural support functions. This consolidation reduces the overall complexity compared to having separate components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The arrangement of damping parts supports the rotor can in both axial and radial directions, reducing vibrations and allowing for a thinner rotor can, thereby enhancing motor efficiency and reducing noise.

Implementation Method 1

there is arranged at least one axial damping part between an axial surface of the can and the support structure. Furthermore, there is arranged at least one radial damping part between an outer circumferential surface of the can and the support structure. The axial and the radial damping part allow a support of the can in axial and radial direction via a damping part arranged therebetween. The damping parts avoid vibrations occurring in the rotor can to be transferred to the surrounding support structure.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration damping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS20250141300A1Electric motor
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 GRUNDFOS HLDG
  • US20250141300A1 patent drawing
  • US20250141300A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pump unit includes at least one impeller (4) and an electric motor connected to the at least one impeller (4). The electric motor includes a stator (12), a rotor (8) and a can (18) between the stator (12) and the rotor (8). The can (18), on its first axial end, is in engagement with a support structure (10). At least one axial damping part (32) is arranged between an axial surface (26) of the can (18) and the support structure (10), and at least one radial damping part (34) is arranged between an outer circumferential surface of the can (18) and the support structure (10).