Rotor Drive Key Assembly for Heat- and Vibration-Stable Wheel Attachment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wheel brake systems face challenges in securely attaching rotor drive keys to wheels, particularly due to the risk of fasteners loosening under heat cycling and vibration, which can lead to premature wear and maintenance issues.

Innovation Solution

The use of rotor drive keys with a U-shaped cross-section that dovetail with the wheel boss, combined with axially extending fasteners that thread into the wheel boss, provides secure attachment against radial, tangential, and axial movements, reducing the likelihood of fastener loosening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fasteners are used to attach rotor drive keys to wheels, then the attachment method is simple, but the fasteners may loosen under heat cycling and vibration leading to premature wear and maintenance issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment stabilityVSAvoidattachment structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment structure is divided into multiple functional elements: the rotor drive key with U-shaped cross-section, the wheel boss with receiving features, and axially extending fasteners. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function optimally while working together to prevent loosening under heat cycling and vibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor drive key employs a U-shaped cross-section that is asymmetric in design, with specific features positioned to engage with corresponding features on the wheel boss. This asymmetric configuration creates a mechanically locked arrangement that resists loosening forces from vibration and thermal expansion differently in various directions, enhancing overall attachment stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If the rotor drive key is securely attached to prevent loosening, then attachment reliability improves, but the structural complexity of the drive key increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefastener retentionVSAvoiddrive key structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the rotor drive key structure with integrated attachment features directly into the key body. The U-shaped cross-section incorporates recesses and engagement surfaces that combine the functions of the drive key and the fastening mechanism into a single integrated component, reducing the need for separate attachment hardware while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor drive key features nested structural elements where the U-shaped cross-section contains internal recesses and geometric features that receive and secure the axially extending fasteners. This nesting arrangement allows the fastening mechanism to be embedded within the drive key structure itself, providing secure retention while maintaining a compact overall form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS11585387B2Rotor drive key assembly
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11585387B2 patent drawing
  • US11585387B2 patent drawing
  • US11585387B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, an assembly includes a rotor drive key configured to be positioned over a wheel boss defined by a wheel. A drive key body defines a trough configured to receive the wheel boss. An inner surface of the drive key body is configured to establish a conforming contact with an outer profile of the wheel boss and oppose relative motion of the rotor drive key in a radial direction of the wheel. The rotor drive key includes a tab having a tab aperture configured to receive a fastener extending in an axial direction of the wheel and engaging the wheel boss.