Rotor Flux Shields for Higher Torque Density in Compact Motors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electric motors face limitations in achieving high torque and power densities in compact designs, necessitating innovative approaches to enhance motor performance without increasing size or relying solely on stronger magnetic fields.

Innovation Solution

The integration of flux barriers made from electrically conductive materials between rotor poles, which alter the path of magnetic flux to increase the magnetically induced motive force, allowing for higher torque and power densities by redirecting magnetic flux more tangentially, thereby improving motor efficiency and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the size of the motor is increased to achieve higher torque and power densities, then the motor performance is improved, but the compactness and applicability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque and power densityVSAvoidmotor size
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the magnetic flux distribution parameters by introducing flux barriers with specific electrical conductivity properties. The flux barriers have higher electrical conductivity than the surrounding ferromagnetic material, which alters the magnetic flux path to increase the tangential component. This parameter change enables higher torque density without increasing motor volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite magnetic circuit structures combining ferromagnetic material with flux barriers of different electrical conductivity. This composite approach creates optimized magnetic flux paths that enhance torque production while maintaining compact dimensions, resolving the contradiction between power density and size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Force

If stronger magnetic fields are created to increase electromagnetic force, then motor performance is improved, but the complexity and cost of magnetic materials increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic forceVSAvoidmagnetic field generation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional approach of using stronger magnets or higher current with a geometric and material property-based solution. By strategically placing flux barriers with specific conductivity properties, the system redirects existing magnetic flux to produce higher electromagnetic force without requiring stronger magnetic fields, thus reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The flux barriers act as intermediary elements that mediate the magnetic flux distribution. These barriers with higher electrical conductivity than ferromagnetic material serve as conductors that redirect flux paths, enabling enhanced force production without directly increasing magnetic field strength or complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Volume of moving object

If conventional motor designs are used to achieve compact size, then motor compactness is maintained, but torque and power densities are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor compactnessVSAvoidtorque and power density
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality changes by introducing flux barriers with specific electrical conductivity properties at strategic locations within the motor. The flux barriers have higher electrical conductivity than the surrounding ferromagnetic material, creating localized regions that redirect magnetic flux to enhance torque production while maintaining overall compact dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Power

If magnetic flux is redirected more tangentially to increase motive force, then torque density is improved, but magnetic fringing effects may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetically induced motive forceVSAvoidmagnetic fringing
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the magnetic flux distribution parameters by using flux barriers with higher electrical conductivity than ferromagnetic material. This parameter change redirects flux more tangentially to increase motive force while the controlled geometry of flux barriers helps manage fringing effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly enhances torque and power densities, allowing for more efficient energy transfer and reduced magnetic fringing, leading to improved motor performance and efficiency, particularly in compact motor applications.

Implementation Method 1

flux barriers made from electrically conductive materials between rotor poles, which alter the path of magnetic flux to increase the magnetically induced motive force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux redirection: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

alter the path of magnetic flux to increase the magnetically induced motive force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

Generally, eddy currents will be induced in the flux barrier that cause destructive interference of an impending magnetic field, such that the flux barrier effectively acts to inhibit a change in magnetic flux during motor operation, which in some cases will result in a repulsive force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 4

eddy currents will be induced in the flux barrier that cause destructive interference of an impending magnetic field... which in some cases will result in a repulsive force that will act to increase an induced motive force on the passive poles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS11831199B2Electric motors having flux shields for motor poles
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 TAU MOTORS INC
  • US11831199B2 patent drawing
  • US11831199B2 patent drawing
  • US11831199B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric motor has a stator defining multiple stator poles with associated electrical windings, and a rotor having multiple rotor poles. The rotor has flux barriers between adjacent rotor poles, the flux barriers each having a material with an electrical conductivity higher than the rotor pole material. The flux barriers are electrically isolated from one another external to the ferromagnetic material. Eddy currents are induced in the flux barrier to cause destructive interference of an impending magnetic field, such that the flux barrier effectively acts to inhibit magnetic flux during motor operation, which in some cases will result in a repulsive force that will act to increase an induced motive force on the rotor poles.