Rotor Ice Protection System Redundancy for DAL A Certification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rotor ice protection systems designed for DAL B certification require significant redesign or additional components to achieve DAL A certification, lacking effective redundancy for critical failure mitigation.

Innovation Solution

A rotor ice protection system with redundant circuitry, sensors, and indicator units that monitor and report electrical loads to the pilot, enabling independent verification of RIPS operations and alerting for discrepancies, thereby enhancing safety without additional mechanical or electrical components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional rotor ice protection systems are designed for DAL B certification, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability is insufficient for catastrophic failure mitigation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure mitigation capabilityVSAvoidsystem redesign requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where sensor systems continuously monitor electrical load parameters of the RIPS and provide real-time data to the controller. The controller compares actual sensor readings with expected values and provides feedback to adjust operations or alert the pilot, creating a closed-loop system that enhances reliability without requiring complete system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sensor systems as intermediary components between the RIPS circuitry and the pilot indication system. These sensors act as mediators that detect electrical load conditions and translate them into actionable information for the pilot, enabling DAL A certification through enhanced monitoring rather than complete system replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If redundant mechanical or electrical components are added to achieve DAL A certification, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveredundancy capabilityVSAvoidadditional components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a monitoring copy of the RIPS electrical load parameters through sensor systems. Instead of creating physical redundant heating systems, the patent creates an informational copy of the electrical load data that can be independently verified and used for safety assurance, achieving redundancy in measurement rather than in the primary function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces potential mechanical redundancy approaches with electrical and electronic monitoring solutions. By using sensor systems to detect and report electrical load conditions, the patent achieves DAL A certification through electronic substitution rather than mechanical duplication of components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If sensor systems are implemented to monitor electrical loads, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical load detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system addition
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor systems implemented in the patent are designed to serve multiple functions: monitoring electrical load parameters, detecting RIPS operation status, providing feedback to the controller, and enabling pilot awareness. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while achieving high measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively upgrades DAL B certified rotor ice protection to DAL A standards by providing redundant detection and alert mechanisms, ensuring accurate operation and reducing catastrophic failure risks without significant redesign or additional components.

Implementation Method 1

the sensor system includes a Hall effect sensor disposed on the circuitry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Implementation Method 2

a RIPS assembly configured to heat the rotor blades

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10556695B2Rotor ice protection system
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP
  • US10556695B2 patent drawing
  • US10556695B2 patent drawing
  • US10556695B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor ice protection system (RIPS) apparatus for an aircraft to heat aircraft rotor blades is provided. The RIPS apparatus includes circuitry disposed to transmit electrical loads associated with RIPS operations, an indicator unit disposed to alert a pilot of the aircraft to a RIPS condition indicating an operating status of the RIPS operations, a controller configured to actuate the RIPS operations in accordance with current conditions and to issue a command to the indicator unit to alert the pilot to the RIPS operations according to the actuation and a sensor system disposed to sense whether the circuitry is transmitting the electrical loads and to provide a sensing result to the indicator unit. The indicator unit additionally alerts the pilot to the RIPS operations according to the sensing result.