Rotor Rotor Mass Non-Parallel Magnet Housing Rows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to improve the magnetic performance and torque density of rotary electric machines while reducing manufacturing and assembly costs, particularly in high-speed applications such as electric vehicles and industrial power generation.

Innovation Solution

A rotor design featuring a rotor body with stacked laminations and recesses arranged in non-parallel rows, where the first row comprises a U-shape with a central recess free of a magnet and the second row in a V-shape, optimizing the placement and orientation of permanent magnets to enhance saliency torque and reduce magnetic leakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If permanent magnets are arranged in parallel rows in conventional rotors, then the structure is simple and manufacturing is easier, but the torque density and magnetic performance are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque densityVSAvoidrecess arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by arranging the first and second rows of recesses at different orientations (first row at angle α1, second row at angle α2 where α1 ≠ α2). This asymmetric configuration creates non-uniform magnetic flux distribution that enhances saliency torque while maintaining manufacturability through standardized recess geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from conventional parallel row arrangements to a multi-dimensional configuration where rows are oriented at different angles relative to the pole axis. This dimensional change in the arrangement pattern enables enhanced magnetic performance by creating complex flux paths that exploit both radial and tangential components of the magnetic field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Power

If more permanent magnets are added to increase torque, then the torque output increases, but the manufacturing cost and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque outputVSAvoidmanufacturing and assembly cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the central recess of the first row optional for magnet placement. This allows flexible configuration where magnets can be placed only in lateral recesses or in all recesses depending on performance requirements and cost constraints, enabling local optimization of the magnetic circuit without uniform increases throughout the entire rotor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the magnet arrangement into distinct rows with different orientations and optional central recesses. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each row's contribution to torque production, enabling selective placement of magnets to achieve desired performance at lower cost compared to uniform dense magnetization throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Speed

If the rotor is designed for high-speed operation, then the operational speed increases, but mechanical strength and stability become critical concerns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational speedVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining laminated magnetic core structures with permanently magnetized components. The lamination structure provides mechanical strength and stability at high speeds while the permanent magnets provide the necessary magnetic field. This composite approach allows the rotor to withstand high-speed centrifugal forces while maintaining magnetic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design increases torque density without increasing magnet volume, reduces electromagnetic losses and noise, and improves mechanical strength, making it suitable for high-speed operations.

Implementation Method 1

permanent magnets of various geometric shapes... defining poles of the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

permanent magnets arranged in non-parallel rows... enhancing saliency torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field interaction: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

rotor body comprising laminations stacked one on top of the other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current reduction through lamination: Lamination

Data Source

PatentUS20240146127A1Rotor for a rotary electric machine
Publication Date: 2024.05.02 NIDEC PAS EMOTORS
  • US20240146127A1 patent drawing
  • US20240146127A1 patent drawing
  • US20240146127A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor (30) for a rotary electric machine, comprising a rotor mass (33) comprising laminations stacked one on top of the other, the rotor mass (33) comprising a plurality of housings (10), at least some of the housings, or even all of the housings, receiving one or more permanent magnets (1) defining poles of the rotor, the housings of a pole being arranged in at least a first row (11) and a second row (12) of housings which are not parallel to one another, the first row (11) of housings comprising at least three housings arranged in a U shape, with at least one central housing and two lateral housings, the central housing of the first row being able to do without a permanent magnet, the second row (12) of housings comprising housings arranged in a V shape, in particular two housings arranged in a V shape.