Rotor Collective Pitch Control via Mu for Flapping and RPM Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current rotor aircraft require significant pilot input to adjust collective pitch and rotor RPM across various flight conditions, leading to increased workload and instability, especially at high speeds where rotor flapping must be carefully managed within a narrow range.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that automatically adjusts collective pitch and rotor RPM based on measured airspeed and rotor speed, using a predetermined curve to maintain optimal flapping and rotational speed, with a tilting mast to control rotor RPM during high-speed flight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the pilot manually adjusts collective pitch and rotor RPM across various flight conditions, then the rotor aircraft can operate through different flight phases, but the pilot workload increases and stability control becomes difficult especially at high speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational capability across flight conditionsVSAvoidpilot workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically monitoring flight conditions and adjusting collective pitch and rotor RPM without pilot intervention. The controller continuously adapts rotor parameters based on measured airspeed and rotational speed, allowing the system to regulate itself through different flight phases from inertia-powered takeoff through high-speed cruise to landing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by measuring airspeed and rotor rotational speed, comparing these parameters against desired values, and automatically adjusting collective pitch and rotor tilt to maintain optimal performance. This closed-loop control ensures stability across varying flight conditions without increasing pilot workload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If the rotor is unloaded to achieve high advance ratio flight (Mu > 0.7), then aircraft speed can exceed conventional limits, but rotor flapping must be kept within a narrow range requiring precise control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft forward speedVSAvoid rotor flapping stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically by adjusting collective pitch and rotor tilt angle based on measured airspeed and rotational speed. As the aircraft accelerates through different flight phases, the controller continuously modifies these parameters to maintain stable rotor operation and control flapping within acceptable limits while enabling high-speed flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static to dynamic control by continuously adapting rotor parameters during flight. The controller responds to real-time measurements of airspeed and rotor speed, dynamically adjusting collective pitch and mast tilt to maintain stability as the aircraft progresses through different flight conditions from takeoff to high-speed cruise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If automatic control is implemented to reduce pilot workload, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot workload reductionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs multiple functions using a single integrated system. It measures airspeed and rotor rotational speed, calculates the advance ratio, determines appropriate collective pitch and rotor tilt settings, and executes adjustments all through one control unit. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems while achieving automatic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces pilot workload by automating collective pitch and rotor RPM adjustments, maintaining stable flapping within safe limits and ensuring rotor stability across all flight conditions, including high-speed operations.

Implementation Method 1

The rotor has tip weights to provide high inertia, and the inertia drives the rotor, which causes the aircraft to lift

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

the blades must be free to pivot up and down relative to the hub. This free flapping allows the advancing blade, which if it has more lift due to a higher velocity across it than the retreating blade, to rise or flap up

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotor flapping:

Implementation Method 3

The operator also decreases the aft tilt of the rotor, which reduces the air stream flowing through the rotor, thus decreasing the rotational speed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag control: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS7448571B1Rotor collective pitch VS Mu to control flapping and mast/rotor tilt to control rotor RPM
Publication Date: 2008.11.11 JAUNT AIR MOBILITY LLC
  • US7448571B1 patent drawing
  • US7448571B1 patent drawing
  • US7448571B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a rotor aircraft involves measuring an airspeed of the aircraft and a rotational speed of the rotor. A controller determines a Mu of the rotor based on the airspeed of the aircraft and the rotational speed of the rotor. The controller varies the collective pitch of the rotor blades in relationship to the Mu, from an inertia powered jump takeoff, through high speed high advance ratio flight, through a low speed landing approach, to a zero or short roll flare landing. In addition as the rotor is unloaded and the rotor slows down, the controller maintains a minimum rotor RPM with the use of a tilting mast.