Propulsion Rotor Platform I-Beam Stress Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The I-beam configuration of airflow platforms between adjacent rotor blades in aircraft engines experiences significant radially outward centrifugal body loads, leading to deflection and high axial stresses due to the radially outward centrifugal body load, which causes high axial stresses applied to the flowpath component.

Innovation Solution

The platform design includes an axially extending I-beam with inner and outer flanges and an outer skin defining a flowpath surface, featuring laterally-extending forward and aft end flanges that abut the outer skin, providing additional support and reducing stress through increased contact surface area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If an I-beam configuration is used for the platform, then the platform can provide structural support between rotor blades, but the platform deflects radially outward under centrifugal load causing high axial stresses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform structural supportVSAvoidaxial stress
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by bonding a metal I-beam to a non-metallic skin panel (such as composite or titanium) to create a hybrid structure. This composite construction allows the metal I-beam to provide structural support against centrifugal loads while the non-metallic skin reduces overall density and weight, thereby reducing deflection and axial stresses under operational loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges two different materials (metal I-beam and non-metallic skin) into a single integrated platform structure. The metal I-beam and skin panel are bonded together to form a composite beam that combines the high strength of metal with the low weight of non-metallic materials, resolving the contradiction between structural support and stress reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Strength

If a metal I-beam is used for the platform, then structural strength is achieved, but weight is increased leading to greater centrifugal loads and deflection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform strengthVSAvoidplatform weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by combining a metal I-beam with a non-metallic skin panel. The metal provides necessary structural strength while the non-metallic skin has lower density, reducing the overall weight of the platform. This weight reduction decreases centrifugal body loads during rotation, thereby reducing deflection and axial stresses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using different materials in different locations of the platform structure. The metal I-beam is positioned where high strength is needed to resist bending moments, while the non-metallic skin covers the platform surface where lower weight is beneficial. This localized material distribution optimizes the strength-to-weight ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If the platform deflects radially outward under centrifugal load, then the I-beam structure maintains its shape, but high axial stresses are applied to the flowpath component

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveI-beam shape stabilityVSAvoidaxial stress on flowpath component
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by bonding a metal I-beam to a non-metallic skin panel. This composite construction reduces the overall density and weight of the platform, thereby reducing centrifugal body loads during rotation. The reduced loads decrease both the deflection of the I-beam and the axial stresses transmitted to the flowpath component, while the metal I-beam maintains structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces platform stresses, increases durability, and allows for simpler and more economical manufacturing by using non-metal, composite materials like graphite fibers in an epoxy resin, effectively mitigating the high axial stresses caused by deflection.

Implementation Method 1

In operation, there is a significant radially outward centrifugal body load on the platform.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

allows for simpler and more economical manufacturing by using non-metal, composite materials like graphite fibers in an epoxy resin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComposite material strength: Composite Materials

Data Source

PatentUS11242763B2Platform apparatus for propulsion rotor
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11242763B2 patent drawing
  • US11242763B2 patent drawing
  • US11242763B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A platform for use between adjacent propulsion rotor airfoils joined to a rotor disk to provide an inner flowpath boundary includes: an axially extending I-beam supporting a radially outer skin having a flowpath surface; the I-beam including an inner I-flange disposed at an inner edge of an axially extending I-web, and an outer I-flange disposed at an outer edge of the I-web; the I-beam including a laterally-extending forward end flange at a forward end of the I-web, and a laterally-extending aft end flange at an aft end of the I-web; and the radially outer skin disposed on top of and joined to the radially outer I-flange such that the forward end flange and the aft end flange abut the outer skin.