Asynchronous Rotor Retaining Elements for High-Speed Stress

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Asynchronous machines with die-cast squirrel-cage rotors face challenges at high speeds due to centrifugal force stress and thermal expansion, leading to material cracks or fractures at the junction between rotor rods and cage rings, with existing solutions being costly or unsuitable.

Innovation Solution

A squirrel-cage rotor design featuring retaining elements, such as disk-shaped or spoke-shaped structures, that extend radially and axially to overlap the cage ring and rotor rods, preventing deformation and fractures by absorbing stress without increasing the external diameter, and can be retrofitted onto existing rotors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the rotor operates at high speeds, then the power output increases, but centrifugal force stress and thermal expansion cause material cracks or fractures at the junction between rotor rods and cage rings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidmaterial integrity at junction
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor is divided into functionally distinct segments: the laminated core with grooves containing rotor rods, and separate cage rings at each end face. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for its specific mechanical and electrical functions, reducing stress concentration at interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The groove structure in the laminated core acts as an intermediary element between the rotor rods and cage rings. The grooves provide a controlled interface that distributes mechanical stresses and accommodates thermal expansion, preventing direct stress transmission that would cause fractures at the junction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If retaining elements are added to suppress shear stress, then the rotor reliability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor reliability at high speedVSAvoidnumber of additional parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining elements are merged with the balancing weights that are already present on the rotor. By integrating the stress-suppressing function into existing structural components, the solution improves reliability without adding separate parts, thus avoiding increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining elements serve multiple functions simultaneously: they suppress shear stress at the rotor rod-cage ring junction, maintain structural integrity during high-speed operation, and work together with the balancing weights. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for additional dedicated stress-suppression components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the retaining element overlaps the cage ring and rotor rods, then the shear stress is suppressed, but the external diameter of the laminated core increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress suppression at junctionVSAvoidexternal diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of extending the retaining element radially outward (which would increase external diameter), the solution utilizes the axial dimension by positioning the retaining elements at the end faces of the laminated core. This dimensional shift allows stress suppression without increasing the rotor's external diameter, maintaining compatibility with the stator air gap.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If existing rotors are retrofitted with retaining elements, then the solution becomes more adaptable, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretrofit capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining elements are designed to be installed during the initial rotor assembly process, before the rotor enters service. By performing the modification as a preliminary action during manufacturing, the solution achieves adaptability for existing rotor designs without requiring complex retrofit procedures later, as the elements are integrated into the standard assembly sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The retaining elements effectively suppress shear stress at the junction, preventing material failure and allowing high-speed operation without additional parts, while maintaining a constant air gap and enabling balancing functions, thus enhancing the rotor's durability and manufacturability.

Implementation Method 1

At comparatively high speeds the ends of the cage rods projecting on both sides out of the laminated core of the rotor and the cage rings connected thereto are subject to very high centrifugal force stress

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

as a result of high temperatures that cause a thermal expansion of, among other things, the cage ring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS8946969B2Rotor of an asynchronous machine with retaining element
Publication Date: 2015.02.03 SIEMENS AG
  • US8946969B2 patent drawing
  • US8946969B2 patent drawing
  • US8946969B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A squirrel-cage rotor of an asynchronous machine, in particular a die-cast rotor, includes a rotatable shaft, a laminated core being rotation-locked on the shaft and having grooves and opposing end faces. A squirrel-cage winding has rotor rods disposed in the grooves and a cage ring disposed on each of the end faces and electrically connecting the rotor rods. A pair of retaining elements is disposed on the shaft, wherein each retaining element extends in a radial direction in form of a disk or a spoke and has in an axial direction a wall and/or an axially extending finger. The wall overlaps on a radial periphery in the axial direction both the cage ring and a predefined axial section of the rotor rods that terminate in the cage ring, without increasing an external diameter of the laminated core.