Rotor Assembly Scoops Reduce Tip Vortices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Engine fan flutter caused by shocks at blade tips and tip vortices in rotor assemblies, such as gas turbine engines, is undesirable and challenging to mitigate effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a rotor assembly with concentric inner and outer walls and a plurality of scoops or wear members that deflect and reorient the flow to reduce tip vortices, minimizing the annular gap between the blades and the outer wall, and using scoops that form closed channels to transform the flow into a more laminar orientation upstream of the blades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If the annular gap between blades and outer wall is minimized, then tip vortices and flow losses are reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetip vorticesVSAvoidannular gap dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Scoops are introduced as intermediary flow control devices positioned between the outer wall and blades. These scoops actively manage the flow in the annular gap region, transforming it into a more laminar flow pattern that reduces tip vortices without requiring the gap to be minimized to extreme precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The flow characteristics in the annular gap are changed by introducing scoops that modify velocity distribution and flow regime. By changing the flow parameters (introducing laminarizing elements), the harmful tip vortex effect is reduced without changing the geometric parameter (gap dimension) to extreme values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If scoops are added to deflect flow, then flutter and vibration are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade stabilityVSAvoidscoop array structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control function is segmented into multiple discrete scoop elements arranged in a circumferential array. Each scoop handles a portion of the flow, and the collective effect of these segmented elements achieves comprehensive flow management while keeping individual components simple and manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The scoop structure is designed to be stationary and fixed to the housing, allowing it to passively deflect flow without requiring active control systems. The flow itself interacts with the scoops to create the laminarizing effect, making the system self-regulating and reducing control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If scoops extend radially closer to blades, then flow deflection effectiveness increases, but risk of interference with blade path increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow deflection efficiencyVSAvoidflow interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The scoops are positioned to perform flow deflection and laminarization in advance, before the flow reaches the blade region. This preliminary action transforms the flow characteristics upstream of the blades, allowing the scoops to be positioned closer to the blades without causing direct interference, as the harmful flow patterns are already corrected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces tip vortices, blade vibration, and flutter by minimizing flow losses and adverse pressure effects, enhancing the efficiency and stability of the rotor assembly.

Implementation Method 1

separating an outer portion of a flow through the annular flow path from a central portion of the flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

transform the flow into a more laminar orientation upstream of the blades

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaminar flow: Laminar Flow

Implementation Method 3

tip vortices created in the flow adjacent the blade tips

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTip vortices: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 4

minimizing flow losses and adverse pressure effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow losses: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS9957807B2Rotor assembly with scoop
Publication Date: 2018.05.01 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US9957807B2 patent drawing
  • US9957807B2 patent drawing
  • US9957807B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor assembly having a plurality of scoops disposed in a circumferential array, the scoops extending from an inner surface of the outer wall of the flow path along a radial distance smaller than a radial distance between the inner and outer walls of the flow path. Each of the scoops forms a closed channel from an inlet to an outlet with the inlet and outlet being axially spaced from one another, the outlet being upstream of and adjacent the annular blade path. A gas turbine engine and method of reducing tip vortices in a rotor assembly are also discussed.