Asymmetric Rotor Spoke Layout for Eddy Current Brake Fatigue

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional eddy current deceleration devices do not adequately address the fatigue damage caused by repeated bending loads in both the circumferential and axial directions applied to the spokes, which affects the durability of the device.

Innovation Solution

The design includes a spoke with specific neutral axes positioned to reduce maximum tensile stress when bent in both directions, with the first neutral axis forward in the rotating direction and the second neutral axis on the rotor body side, thereby minimizing stress concentrations and fatigue damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the spoke is designed with conventional symmetric structure, then the manufacturing is simple, but the fatigue damage occurs due to bending loads in both circumferential and axial directions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidspoke structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spoke is designed with an asymmetric cross-sectional shape where the thickness in the circumferential direction differs from the thickness in the axial direction. Specifically, the spoke has a larger thickness in the circumferential direction to resist bending loads generated during braking, while maintaining appropriate thickness in the axial direction. This asymmetric design optimizes the stress distribution and prevents fatigue damage without requiring overly complex structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The spoke cross-section is designed with non-uniform thickness distribution, where different regions have different thicknesses to match the local stress requirements. The region experiencing higher bending stresses has increased thickness, while regions with lower stresses maintain smaller thickness. This local quality optimization ensures durability in critical areas while avoiding unnecessary material in non-critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the spoke thickness is increased to resist bending loads, then the strength increases, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending resistanceVSAvoidspoke weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spoke employs non-uniform thickness distribution in its cross-section, with thicker regions positioned where bending stresses are highest and thinner regions where stresses are lower. This ensures adequate strength and bending resistance while minimizing the overall material usage and weight of the spoke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The spoke utilizes material distribution optimization where the cross-sectional thickness varies to achieve the desired strength-to-weight ratio. By strategically placing material only where structurally necessary, the design achieves high bending resistance without proportionally increasing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If the spoke thickness in axial direction is increased, then the thermal expansion restraint improves, but the air resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal expansion restraintVSAvoidair resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spoke cross-section is designed with optimized thickness in the axial direction that provides sufficient restraint against thermal expansion of the rotor body during braking. The thickness is increased only to the extent necessary to maintain structural stability and control thermal expansion, rather than being uniformly thick throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The spoke exhibits asymmetric thickness characteristics where the dimension in the axial direction is optimized independently from the dimension in the circumferential direction. This allows the axial thickness to be tailored specifically for thermal expansion restraint while the circumferential thickness addresses bending load requirements, and the reduced thickness minimizes air resistance during rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively reduces fatigue damage to the spokes, improving the durability and enabling the eddy current deceleration device to support high braking forces while reducing size and weight, thus enhancing mountability and fuel efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a rotor body, which is an electric conductor, rotates within magnetic fields produced by a row of magnets and thereby eddy currents are generated on the rotor body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

The eddy currents and the magnetic fields interact with each other to generate a braking force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field interaction: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

Joule's heat is produced in the rotor body on which eddy currents flow, and a temperature of the rotor body rises

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 4

This causes thermal expansion of the rotor body to increase its diameter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS12003160B2Eddy current deceleration device
Publication Date: 2024.06.04 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US12003160B2 patent drawing
  • US12003160B2 patent drawing
  • US12003160B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An eddy current deceleration device includes a rotor and a stator. The rotor includes a hub, a rotor body, and a spoke. The spoke has neutral axes. The first neutral axis is a neutral axis when the spoke is bent in a circumferential direction of the rotor body. The first neutral axis is positioned forward in a rotating direction of the rotor with respect to a center line of the spoke in the circumferential direction. The second neutral axis is a neutral axis when the spoke is bent in an axial direction of the rotor body. The second neutral axis is positioned on a rotor body side with respect to a center line of the spoke in the axial direction.