Rotating Electrical Machine Rotor Torque Ripple Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing permanent magnet embedded rotating electrical machines with flat magnets in rotational symmetry face challenges in suppressing torque ripple, which causes vibration and noise due to rapid magnetic flux density changes between adjacent magnetic poles.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a rotor with alternately arranged first and second flat permanent magnets, featuring concave and convex portions that bisect the angular width between magnetic poles, along with a stator with wave-wound coils, to manage magnetic flux and reduce torque ripple.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If flat permanent magnets are arranged in rotational symmetry in the rotor, then the machine structure is simplified and manufacturing is easier, but torque ripple increases causing vibration and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtorque ripple
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces auxiliary magnetic poles with different magnetic properties at specific locations between the permanent magnets. These auxiliary poles have tailored magnetic flux densities and polarities that locally modify the magnetic field distribution, thereby suppressing torque ripple without changing the overall rotational symmetry of the rotor structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

While maintaining the rotational symmetry of the permanent magnets, the invention introduces asymmetric auxiliary magnetic poles at specific positions between them. This localized asymmetry in magnetic pole configuration creates compensating magnetic fields that reduce torque ripple while preserving the overall symmetric rotor structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the number of auxiliary magnetic poles is increased, then torque ripple suppression improves, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque ripple suppressionVSAvoidnumber of magnetic poles
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a minimal number of auxiliary magnetic poles (one or two per interval between permanent magnets) rather than increasing the total pole count significantly. This partial action approach provides sufficient torque ripple suppression while avoiding excessive device complexity and manufacturing difficulty

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If the electrical degree range of concave portions is adjusted, then torque ripple suppression optimizes for V-shaped magnets, but the solution cannot be applied to block-form flat magnets with rotational symmetry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque ripple suppression precisionVSAvoidapplicability to different magnet arrangements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention determines specific electrical degree ranges (first and second electrical degrees) for the auxiliary magnetic poles based on the stator's slot configuration. These parameter specifications allow the same auxiliary pole concept to be effectively applied to block-form flat magnets with rotational symmetry, unlike previous solutions optimized only for V-shaped magnets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively suppresses torque ripple, reducing vibration and noise by optimizing the magnetic flux distribution and electrical degree settings, resulting in a smoother torque waveform and improved machine performance.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of flat permanent magnets 17A and 17B are embedded in the rotor core 16... a stator 11 having coils 13... rotor 15 rotatably located inside the stator 11

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Rapid change in magnetic flux density occurs between the two adjacent permanent magnets... concave and convex portions that bisect the angular width between magnetic poles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP2296259B1Permanent magnet embedded rotating electrical machine
Publication Date: 2017.12.20 TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORP
  • EP2296259B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2296259B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2296259B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The permanent magnet embedded rotating electrical machine includes a rotor and a plurality of flat permanent magnets. The rotor has on an outer periphery thereof a plurality of pairs of concave portions and a plurality of convex portions. Each of the convex portions is located between the pair of concave portions. The concave portions are formed at radially outward of respective adjacent magnetic pole ends of the permanent magnet. A bridge is provided in the rotor at an angular position about an axis of the rotor between opposed magnetic pole ends of two adjacent permanent magnets. Each concave portion at radially outward of the magnetic pole end of the permanent magnet is located close to the center of the same permanent magnet in relation to the bridge next to the permanent magnet in the circumferential direction of the rotor.