Rotor Winding Turn Reduction for Coil Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In electric motors with wound rotors, there is a risk of the last turns of the coil slipping off due to the limited diameter constraint, which can lead to malfunction, and existing solutions cannot prevent this without increasing the rotor size.

Innovation Solution

The rotor design features a cylindrical central core with radially extending arms, where the last coil has fewer turns than the preceding coils, and additional turns are wound between arms to overlap with the last coil, ensuring retention without increasing the rotor diameter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the diameter of the rotor is limited to reduce machine size, then the rotor becomes more compact and easier to use in vehicles, but the last turns of the coil are at risk of slipping off during operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor sizeVSAvoidcoil turn retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by reducing the number of turns in the last coil before assembly, and adding retention elements (such as retaining rings or clips) that are pre-installed on the rotor arms to prevent turn slippage. This preventive measure is taken before the coil turns can slip off during operation, thereby maintaining reliability without increasing rotor diameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary retention elements (retaining rings, clips, or similar components) that act as mediators between the coil turns and the rotor arms. These intermediaries mechanically constrain the last turns of the coil, preventing them from slipping off while allowing the rotor to maintain its compact size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the number of turns in the last coil is reduced to prevent slippage, then coil turn retention is improved, but the motor performance is slightly impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil turn retentionVSAvoidmotor performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the last coil different from the other coils in the series. Specifically, the last coil has a reduced number of turns or modified structure only at the critical location where slippage occurs, while the majority of coils maintain their full turn count to preserve motor performance. This localized modification prevents slippage without significantly impacting overall power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If additional turns are wound between arms to overlap and retain the last coil turns, then coil turn retention is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil turn retentionVSAvoidwinding structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the retention function with the existing coil winding structure by integrating retention elements into the winding process itself. The additional turns are wound in conjunction with the main coil assembly, combining the electrical function (coil turns) with the mechanical retention function in a single integrated structure, thereby reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11075557B2Rotor of rotating electrical machine and associated fabrication process
Publication Date: 2021.07.27 VALEO SYST DESSUYAGE SAS
  • US11075557B2 patent drawing
  • US11075557B2 patent drawing
  • US11075557B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a rotor (1) of a rotary electric machine, comprising:a body (3) comprising a cylindrical central core (5) and a circumferential plurality of arms (B1 . . . B18) extending radially out from the cylindrical central core (5), the body (3) being intended to be mounted with the ability to move about an axis of rotation X,a coilset produced by windings of turns and forming at least one series of coils (C1 . . . C9, C1′ . . . C9′), a coil (C1 . . . C9, C1′ . . . C9′) comprising a predetermined number of turns around at least two arms (B1 . . . B18) of the body (3), two adjacent coils (C1 . . . C9, C1′ . . . C9′) of a series being angularly offset from one another with a partial overlap,in which the last coil (C9, C9′), situated radially furthest towards the outside, comprises a predetermined number of turns that is lower than the predetermined number of turns of the other coils of the series (C1 . . . C8, C1′ . . . C8′).