Rotorcraft Flapping Abutment Mechanism Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rotorcraft rotor systems face challenges in effectively limiting the flapping movement of blades, particularly during startup and in windy conditions, with current stop mechanisms being complex, heavy, and requiring multiple mechanical parts, which can lead to unbalance and inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

A rotorcraft rotor with a single cylindrical abutment per lift assembly, hinged to the hub, that moves between an engagement and disengagement position based on rotation speed, using a flyweight and return spring to control flapping, allowing for efficient blocking and release of blade movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional stop mechanisms with multiple mechanical parts are used, then flapping movement can be limited, but device complexity and mass increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflapping movement limitationVSAvoidmechanical parts quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple stop mechanisms into a single integrated abutment structure. The abutment includes both upper and lower stop surfaces that limit flapping in both directions, replacing what would traditionally require separate upper and lower stop members. This merging reduces the number of mechanical parts while maintaining the ability to limit flapping movement effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single abutment structure serves multiple functions: it limits upward flapping via its upper stop surface, limits downward flapping via its lower stop surface, and provides a unified mounting interface to the hub. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate stop mechanisms for different flapping directions, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional stop mechanisms with multiple mechanical parts are used, then flapping movement can be limited, but mass increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflapping movement limitationVSAvoidstop mechanism mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple stop mechanisms into a single integrated abutment structure. The abutment includes both upper and lower stop surfaces that limit flapping in both directions, replacing what would traditionally require separate upper and lower stop members. This merging reduces the number of mechanical parts while maintaining the ability to limit flapping movement effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If fixed abutment tracks are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but flapping control flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabutment track fabricationVSAvoidflapping control flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a movable abutment that can shift position along the abutment track in response to centrifugal forces during rotor operation. The abutment is not fixed in position but can dynamically adjust its location to engage with different portions of the track, allowing the system to maintain simple fixed track manufacturing while achieving flexible flapping control through the movable abutment's dynamic positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies the stop mechanism, reduces mass and complexity, and allows for efficient flapping control in both directions, enhancing rotor performance and reducing mechanical parts, while maintaining stability and balance.

Implementation Method 1

When the rotor is rotating, the centrifugal forces exerted induce the rotation of the flyweight around the axis of displacement. The stop consequently performs a rotation around this axis of movement together with the flyweight.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

a return spring exerting a force on the mechanism to tend to position said stop in the position of 'commitment.' When the rotor is not driven in rotation, the stop is in the engagement position.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2902318B1Rotor for rotorcraft comprising a flappling abutment mechanism, and rotorcraft
Publication Date: 2016.06.01 EUROCOPTER FRANCE SA
  • EP2902318B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2902318B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2902318B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A rotor carrying a plurality of lift assemblies, each having a retention and mobility member. An abutment mechanism of a lift assembly includes an abutment track arranged on the retention and mobility member and a single cylindrical abutment that is movable in pivoting about a movement axis, said abutment extending over a height in elevation and also over a length and over a width. The length is greater than said width, and said height is greater than said length. A fly-weight is secured to pivot with said abutment, and a return spring exerts a force on said fly-weight.