Rotorcraft Beam with Segmented Flexure and Shear Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hingeless and bearingless rotors in rotorcrafts face challenges in reducing the virtual hinge offset, which affects the efficiency of blade movements and load distribution.

Innovation Solution

A beam design with specific flexure and shear portions that alter the virtual hinge location by varying bending and shear stiffness, allowing for reduced virtual hinge offset through controlled bending and shear deformations, applicable to both main and tail rotors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional beam designs are used in hingeless and bearingless rotors, then the structure can support blade loads and enable blade motions, but the virtual hinge offset cannot be reduced, affecting efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade movement efficiencyVSAvoidvirtual hinge offset
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is divided into distinct functional portions: a hub connection portion, a first flexure portion with reduced bending stiffness, and a shear portion with reduced shear stiffness. This segmentation allows each portion to independently control specific deformation characteristics, enabling reduction of virtual hinge offset while maintaining load support capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the beam are assigned different stiffness properties: the first flexure portion has bending stiffness smaller than both the hub connection portion and blade connection portion, while the shear portion has shear stiffness smaller than these same portions. This local differentiation of mechanical properties enables precise control over the virtual hinge location and blade movement efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the beam stiffness is increased to support higher loads, then load bearing capacity improves, but the virtual hinge offset increases, reducing blade movement efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing capacityVSAvoidblade movement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is divided into distinct functional portions: a hub connection portion, a first flexure portion with reduced bending stiffness, and a shear portion with reduced shear stiffness. This segmentation allows each portion to independently control specific deformation characteristics, enabling reduction of virtual hinge offset while maintaining load support capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the beam are assigned different stiffness properties: the first flexure portion has bending stiffness smaller than both the hub connection portion and blade connection portion, while the shear portion has shear stiffness smaller than these same portions. This local differentiation of mechanical properties enables precise control over the virtual hinge location and blade movement efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Weight of moving object

If the beam is made thinner to reduce weight and size, then weight and dimensions decrease, but the beam loses sufficient bending and shear stiffness to support blade loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam weightVSAvoidbending and shear stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is divided into distinct functional portions: a hub connection portion, a first flexure portion with reduced bending stiffness, and a shear portion with reduced shear stiffness. This segmentation allows each portion to independently control specific deformation characteristics, enabling reduction of virtual hinge offset while maintaining load support capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The beam design modifies stiffness parameters locally by creating portions with controlled bending and shear stiffness characteristics. The first flexure portion has bending stiffness smaller than the hub connection and blade connection portions, while the shear portion has shear stiffness smaller than these same portions, enabling weight reduction without compromising overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The beam design reduces the virtual hinge offset, enhancing the efficiency of blade movements and load distribution, thereby improving the rotorcraft's performance and reducing weight and size.

Implementation Method 1

a first flexure portion located between the hub connection portion and the blade connection portion and having a bending stiffness about a first axis which is orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the blade - when connected to the beam - smaller than that of the hub connection portion and that of the blade connection portion about the first axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBending deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a shear portion located between the hub connection portion and the blade connection portion and having a shear stiffness parallel to a second axis which is orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the blade - when connected to the beam - and non-parallel, preferentially orthogonal to the first axis, said shear stiffness being smaller than that of the hub connection portion and that of the blade connection portion, in order to change the location of the virtual hinge that corresponds to the first flexure portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2883790B1Beam for a rotorcraft rotor and rotorcraft rotor
Publication Date: 2017.11.22 AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUT GMBH
  • EP2883790B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2883790B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2883790B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a beam (13) for a rotorcraft rotor and particularly to a helicopter rotor. Said beam (13) comprises a hub connection portion (14), a blade connection portion (15), a first flexure portion (16) located between the hub connection portion (14) and the blade connection portion (15) and having a bending stiffness about a first axis which is orthogonal to the longitudinal axis (X) of the blade (12), said bending stiffness being smaller than that of the hub connection portion (14) and that of the blade connection portion (15) and a shear portion (17) located between the hub connection portion (14) and the blade connection portion (15) and having a shear stiffness parallel to a second axis which is orthogonal to the longitudinal axis (X) of the blade (12) and non-parallel to the first axis. Said shear stiffness is smaller than that of the hub connection portion (14) and that of the blade connection portion (15).