Rotorcraft Fairing with Undulating Trailing Edges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft structural elements, particularly rotorcraft like helicopters, face significant aerodynamic drag issues due to their design, leading to increased energy dissipation, vibrations, and instability, especially with traditional ducted rear rotors like the Fenestron, which have a straight base causing aerodynamic separation and turbulence.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a fairing with a disturbed shape featuring reliefs and hollows along the trailing edges, forming regular or irregular undulations that extend between the trailing edges, reduces aerodynamic drag by modifying the wake structure and promoting faster vortex dissipation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a straight base is used to close the rear part of the Fenestron fairing, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but aerodynamic drag increases significantly due to flow separation and turbulence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curvature by replacing the straight base with an arc-shaped base that follows a curved trajectory. This curved geometry allows the air flow to remain attached to the surface longer, reducing flow separation and turbulence. The arc-shaped base creates a gradual transition rather than an abrupt termination, thereby reducing aerodynamic drag while maintaining structural feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Loss of energy

If the fairing thickness is reduced to less than 15% relative thickness, then aerodynamic drag decreases with profiled shape, but the device mass increases significantly and centering problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic dragVSAvoiddevice mass
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by modifying only the base region of the fairing with an arc-shaped geometry while keeping the rest of the fairing structure relatively unchanged. This localized modification targets the specific area where flow separation occurs, reducing aerodynamic drag without requiring a complete redesign of the entire fairing structure, thereby minimizing additional mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of energy

If a profiled part is added to reduce drag, then aerodynamic performance improves in forward flight, but flight quality deteriorates due to route instability and yaw oscillations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic dragVSAvoidflight stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The arc-shaped base with its curved geometry creates a more gradual flow transition that reduces the intensity and variability of wake fluctuations. This curvature helps stabilize the flow separation pattern, reducing the beating of the wake and the resulting self-sustaining oscillations in yaw, thereby improving flight stability while maintaining drag reduction benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces aerodynamic drag, minimizes fuel consumption, maintains aircraft stability, and avoids excess weight, providing a passive solution applicable to various rotor types without altering flight qualities.

Implementation Method 1

aerodynamic drag in forward flight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Implementation Method 2

aerodynamic separation, that is to say a zone of concentration of vortices and relatively extensive turbulence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

relatively extensive turbulence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentEP2460720B1Structural element of a rotorcraft for reducing aerodynamic drag
Publication Date: 2016.03.30 EUROCOPTER FRANCE SA
  • EP2460720B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a fairing (1) for a structural element of an aircraft, comprising a rear portion (2) substantially orthogonal to the longitudinal direction (L) of the aircraft, extending between two spaced trailing edges (3, 4) and thus having a determined width, said rear portion (2) at least partially obstructing the internal volume delimited by the fairing (1) and generating aerodynamic drag in forward flight. According to the invention, the rear portion has, at least at the trailing edges (3, 4), a perturbed shape along the paths of the airflow (5).