Roughened Interface Light-Emitting Structure for Angular Color Shift Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing light-emitting display technologies, such as OLED and QLED, face challenges in maintaining color accuracy and brightness across viewing angles due to strong scattering at rough interfaces, which can lead to reduced color gamut and increased inter-pixel cross-talk.

Innovation Solution

Introducing a controlled interface roughness between layers of the light-emitting structure, specifically with a root mean square roughness between 5 nm and 30 nm, to create a scattering component that complements the cavity component, thereby reducing angular color shifts and maintaining luminance with varying viewing angles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If strong scattering is used to increase light extraction efficiency, then light extraction efficiency is improved, but color gamut range is reduced and inter-pixel cross-talk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight extraction efficiencyVSAvoidcolor gamut range
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a roughened interface at a specific location within the light-emitting structure (between the substrate and cover layer) rather than uniformly roughening all surfaces. This localized roughening provides scattering exactly where needed to extract trapped light, while leaving other interfaces smooth to maintain color accuracy and avoid inter-pixel cross-talk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the surface roughness parameter of the interface between substrate and cover layer to an RMS roughness of 1-50 nm. This controlled parameter change creates weak scattering that extracts light without the strong scattering effects that degrade color gamut and increase cross-talk, thus resolving the contradiction between light extraction efficiency and color accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If strong scattering is used to increase light extraction efficiency, then light extraction efficiency is improved, but inter-pixel cross-talk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight extraction efficiencyVSAvoidinter-pixel cross-talk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The roughened interface is localized to the substrate-cover layer interface, creating scattering only in this specific region. This localized approach extracts light that would otherwise be trapped without causing broad angular emissions that lead to inter-pixel cross-talk, as the scattering is confined to a specific spatial location rather than occurring throughout the entire light-emitting structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of scattering (which can cause cross-talk) into a beneficial effect by using weak scattering from a roughened interface with controlled RMS roughness of 1-50 nm. This weak scattering is sufficient to extract trapped light but too weak to cause significant inter-pixel cross-talk, thus converting what could be a harmful effect into a beneficial one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Loss of energy

If strong scattering is used to increase light extraction efficiency, then light extraction efficiency is improved, but color shifts with varying angles are exacerbated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight extraction efficiencyVSAvoidcolor shifts with viewing angle
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the surface roughness parameter to a controlled RMS value of 1-50 nm, which creates weak scattering that extracts light without significantly altering the angular distribution of emitted light. This parameter change ensures that light extraction efficiency is improved while color shifts with viewing angle are minimized, as the weak scattering does not substantially broaden the angular emission profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances light extraction efficiency while minimizing color shifts and maintaining brightness across a wider viewing angle range, reducing color shifts by at least a factor of 1.5 in CIE 1976 color space.

Implementation Method 1

The light emitted from the sub-pixel stack includes a scattering component caused by the interface roughness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

The light reflection generally occurs at an inner surface of the bottom electrode. The cavity structure allows narrowing of the wavelength spectrum emitted from the light-emitting structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11626576B2Layered light-emitting structure with roughened interface
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 SHARP KK
  • US11626576B2 patent drawing
  • US11626576B2 patent drawing
  • US11626576B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A light-emitting structure includes a substrate, a sub-pixel stack, a cover layer over the sub-pixel stack, and at least one interface between the substrate and the cover layer. The at least one interface has an interface roughness. The sub-pixel stack includes an emissive layer between a first transport layer and a second transport layer, a first electrode layer coupled to the first transport layer, and a second electrode layer coupled to the second transport layer. The sub-pixel stack is over the substrate and configured to emit light including a scattering component caused by the interface roughness and a cavity component separate from the scattering component. A ratio of a luminance of the scattering component to a luminance of the cavity component increases with a viewing angle relative to a display normal. An optical power of the scattering component is a fraction of an optical power of the cavity component.