Roulette Rotor Speed Control for Randomness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prediction devices capable of determining the sector where a roulette ball will land threaten the unpredictability of roulette outcomes, despite efforts by manufacturers to increase randomness in roulette wheels, as these devices measure rotor and ball speeds to make accurate predictions, shifting the house odds in favor of players.

Innovation Solution

A gaming apparatus with rotor control means that applies a controlled force to alter the rotation speed of the roulette wheel, allowing for variability and randomness by changing the angular velocity in a controlled manner, either manually or with motor assistance, and incorporating ball stops and sensors to further randomize the ball's fall, while maintaining the appearance of a conventional manual wheel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the rotor control means applies a controlled force to alter the rotation speed of the rotor, then the randomness and unpredictability of the roulette wheel is improved, but the device complexity increases due to the addition of motor drive and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunpredictability of roulette outcomeVSAvoidcomplexity of rotor control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor control means is designed to automatically adjust the rotor's rotation speed based on detected ball position and wheel speed, without requiring external manual intervention. The system self-regulates by applying controlled forces through motor drive mechanisms to maintain optimal randomness and prevent prediction device accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces purely manual mechanical wheel operation with a hybrid system that incorporates motor drive mechanisms and electronic control. Sensors detect wheel and ball parameters, and a control system automatically adjusts motor torque to alter rotor speed, substituting human skill with automated mechanical-electrical control to enhance unpredictability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If prediction devices measure the rotation speed of the rotor and ball speed to calculate predicted finishing position, then the measurement precision is improved, but the house odds deteriorate in favor of the player

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of ball position predictionVSAvoidhouse odds advantage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor control means dynamically adjusts the rotor's rotation speed during the ball's travel, changing the deceleration profile in real-time. This dynamic modification of wheel speed makes it impossible for prediction devices to maintain accurate calculations, as the underlying assumptions about constant or predictable deceleration are continuously violated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical parameters of rotor motion by applying controlled forces that alter angular velocity and deceleration rates. By modifying these motion parameters during gameplay, the system ensures that prediction devices measuring initial speeds cannot accurately forecast final ball position, preserving house odds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the rotor control means alters the rotation speed in a controlled manner, then the randomness is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates as manual spinning becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandomness of ball landing positionVSAvoidsimplicity of wheel spinning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor control means operates autonomously to adjust wheel speed without requiring the dealer or player to perform complex manual maneuvers. The system self-regulates rotor deceleration through automated motor control, maintaining simplicity of operation while enhancing randomness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary control system that acts as a mediator between manual wheel spinning and randomness generation. Sensors and motor drive mechanisms serve as intermediaries that automatically adjust rotor speed based on detected parameters, eliminating the need for skilled manual manipulation while preserving the appearance of traditional roulette operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents prediction devices from making accurate predictions by introducing variability in the rotor's deceleration, maintaining the randomness and unpredictability of the roulette wheel, thus preserving the house odds and player engagement.

Implementation Method 1

rotor control means adapted to apply a force to a rotor of the apparatus so as to alter a rotation speed of the rotor in a controlled manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce: Force

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of ball stops/interrupters may be uniformly located around the peripheral inclined surface to introduce further unpredictability to the fall of the ball to the rotor pockets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2179772B1Gaming apparatus
Publication Date: 2014.05.07 CAMMEGH
  • EP2179772B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2179772B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2179772B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A gaming apparatus comprising a rotor control means adapted to apply an external force to a rotor of the gaming apparatus so as to alter a rotation speed of the rotor in a controlled manner.