Round Robin Blending for Petroleum Product Homogeneity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Blending multiple petroleum products for large-scale operations, such as petroleum distribution, is challenging due to the need for extensive storage space, expensive industrial equipment, and time-consuming agitation processes to achieve a homogeneous mixture.

Innovation Solution

The round robin blending method involves transferring each product individually and sequentially into a destination container over multiple cycles, using a single flow meter and control valve, allowing for accurate measurement and control of each product's volume, reducing the complexity and cost of equipment required.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If traditional blending systems are used to mix multiple petroleum products, then a homogeneous mixture is achieved, but the equipment complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehomogeneous mixtureVSAvoidblending system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blending process is segmented into multiple sequential cycles, with each cycle transferring a portion of each product in turn. This divides the complex simultaneous mixing problem into simpler sequential steps, achieving homogeneity through repeated cycles rather than complex agitation equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic cyclic operation to transfer products sequentially through the same pipeline. Each cycle repeats the sequence of transferring portions of different products, and over multiple cycles this periodic action achieves thorough mixing without requiring sophisticated blending machinery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Quantity of substance

If multiple storage containers are used for each product, then product storage capacity is increased, but the space and facility requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct storage capacityVSAvoidfacility space
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The destination container serves multiple functions: it acts as both a storage vessel and a blending chamber. By sequentially transferring portions of different products into this single container over multiple cycles, the system achieves both storage and blending functions without requiring separate dedicated storage facilities for each product blend.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the storage and blending operations into a single integrated process using one destination container. Multiple products are combined in this shared container through cyclic transfers, eliminating the need for separate storage facilities for each constituent product and the final blend.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If sophisticated blending systems are used to mix products, then mixing efficiency is improved, but the equipment cost and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidblending equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the transfer process itself to achieve blending, rather than requiring separate dedicated mixing equipment. The cyclic sequential transfer of products through the pipeline and into the destination container creates natural mixing action, allowing the transport system to serve its own blending function without additional sophisticated machinery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If sequential transfer of products is used, then equipment requirements are reduced, but the blending time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment requirementsVSAvoidblending time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous useful action by immediately beginning the next cycle after completing one cycle of product transfers. Without idle time between cycles, the repeated sequential transfers efficiently achieve blending over multiple continuous cycles, minimizing total blending time while using simple equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10782711B2System and method for round robin product blending
Publication Date: 2020.09.22 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10782711B2 patent drawing
  • US10782711B2 patent drawing
  • US10782711B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, an electronic device, and a computer readable medium for fuel blending are disclosed. The method includes deriving a volume of each product from at least two products that is transferred from separate source containers to fill a destination container. The method also includes transferring a portion of the derived volume of each of the products sequentially into the destination container, wherein each product is transferred one at a time. The method further includes repeating the transfer of the portion of each of the products for a plurality of cycles until the derived volume of each of the products is transferred into the destination container. Each product of at least two products is transferred individually and sequentially during each of the cycles. The portion of the derived volume is based on the plurality of cycles.