Route Planning for Stable Uplink and Downlink Vehicle Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote control systems for vehicles do not adequately consider the differences in communication quality requirements between uplink and downlink communications, leading to instability in bidirectional wireless communication during remote monitoring and control.

Innovation Solution

A route providing apparatus that evaluates communication quality and stability for each direction of communication, determining a stable movement route by considering the specific communication quality requirements for both uplink and downlink communications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single route is selected without considering directional communication quality differences, then route selection is simple, but bidirectional communication stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebidirectional communication stabilityVSAvoidroute evaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the communication quality evaluation into two independent directional assessments: uplink communication quality (from vehicle to server) and downlink communication quality (from server to vehicle). Each direction is evaluated separately using distinct quality indicators, allowing the system to identify routes that satisfy both directional requirements independently rather than using a single aggregated route metric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dimensional distinction by evaluating communication quality along two separate dimensions (uplink and downlink) rather than a single dimension. This dimensional separation enables the system to capture the asymmetric nature of communication requirements in remote monitoring scenarios, where upload and download quality demands differ significantly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If communication quality is evaluated for each direction separately, then communication stability improves, but evaluation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication quality assuranceVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation process is segmented into distinct uplink quality assessment and downlink quality assessment modules. Each module independently evaluates its respective directional quality using appropriate metrics, and the final route selection integrates both assessments through a unified selection criterion that checks satisfaction of both directional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs evaluation for each communication direction separately, which constitutes a more thorough (excessive) evaluation compared to single-direction assessment. This partial separation allows the system to focus evaluation resources on each direction's specific requirements while maintaining overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12513594B2Remote monitoring system, route-providing apparatus, and route-providing method
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 NEC CORP
  • US12513594B2 patent drawing
  • US12513594B2 patent drawing
  • US12513594B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The moving body receives data from a remote monitoring apparatus and transmits data to the remote monitoring apparatus, via the wireless communication network. A candidate route acquisition unit acquires a candidate route of the moving body to a destination. A communication quality evaluation unit evaluates communication quality of the wireless communication network at each location included in the candidate route for each direction of communication by using communication quality information for each direction of communication. A candidate route evaluation unit evaluates communication stability of the candidate route by using communication quality evaluated for each direction of communication. A route determination unit determines a movement route of the moving body among the candidate routes by using an evaluation result of the communication stability.