Vehicle Route Selection Using Lane Line Quality for ADAS Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated and assisted driving systems face challenges in varying driving environments due to infrastructure, lane markings, and presence of other vehicles or pedestrians, leading to inconsistent performance.

Innovation Solution

A method for optimizing vehicle routing that considers lane marking quality, using a routing algorithm to prioritize routes based on the reliability of automated or assisted driving features by aggregating data from multiple sources and evaluating costs such as lane quality, road curvature, and traffic conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If automated driving systems operate in varying driving environments with different infrastructure and lane markings, then the system can serve more diverse locations, but the reliability and safety of automated driving features deteriorate due to inconsistent performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to operate in diverse driving environmentsVSAvoidconsistency of automated driving performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates route costs and identifies suitable routes for automated driving before the actual trip. By determining route suitability in advance based on lane marking quality and environmental factors, the system ensures reliable automated driving operation while maintaining adaptability to diverse environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses map data and lane marking information as a copy or representation of the physical driving environment. This allows the automated system to evaluate route suitability without directly experiencing varying environmental conditions, maintaining consistent performance across diverse locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If the routing algorithm considers multiple environmental factors like lane marking quality and road curvature, then the reliability of automated driving features improves, but the complexity of the routing system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness of automated driving operationVSAvoidcomplexity of routing algorithm
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system is divided into separate functional components: a route identification module that finds possible routes, a cost determination module that evaluates environmental factors for each route section, and a route selection module that chooses the optimal route. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific tasks independently, improving reliability while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system evaluates multiple parameters (lane marking quality, road curvature, traffic conditions) and transforms them into a single route cost metric. By converting diverse environmental factors into a unified cost parameter, the system maintains reliability through comprehensive evaluation while simplifying the final route selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system calculates route cost based on lane marking quality for each section of road, then the safety and robustness of automated driving improves, but the computational time and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of automated drivingVSAvoidroute calculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-determines lane marking quality and environmental characteristics for different road sections and stores this information in map data. When routing is needed, the system quickly retrieves pre-analyzed data rather than performing real-time analysis, ensuring safety through comprehensive evaluation while minimizing computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system focuses route cost calculation on the most critical factors affecting automated driving safety, such as lane marking quality and road curvature, rather than analyzing every possible environmental parameter. This partial action approach maintains safety by evaluating key parameters while reducing overall computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11821740B2Route generation using road lane line quality
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11821740B2 patent drawing
  • US11821740B2 patent drawing
  • US11821740B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for routing a vehicle includes determining, based on roadway section information for two or more potential driving routes for a vehicle, a first route along which a driver assistance feature or an automated driving feature will not be available and a second route along which the driver assistance feature or the automated driving feature will be available. The method further includes providing navigation instructions for the second route to a driver or control system.