Router Policy Enforcement for Real-Time Network Threat Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network systems lack effective real-time protection against advanced persistent threats and day-zero attacks due to increased data network speeds and complexity from network disaggregation, with existing methods failing to provide preemptive security for distributed denial of service (DDoS), protocol anomalies, and zero-day attacks.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a traffic collector, machine learning component, and policy component for real-time analysis of packet metadata to detect anomalies and autonomously generate mitigation policies, which are enforced across network endpoints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If standard protocols (netflow/sflow) with offline analysis are used, then system complexity is reduced, but real-time threat detection capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidreal-time threat detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and analyzing packet metadata in real-time before threats fully materialize. The anomaly detection system proactively identifies patterns and generates policy rules in advance, enabling preemptive mitigation rather than reactive response to attacks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary anomaly detection system that sits between standard networking protocols and policy enforcement. This intermediary layer analyzes packet metadata and generates anomaly scores, translating raw network data into actionable policy rules without requiring fundamental changes to existing networking infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If dedicated intrusion prevention systems are deployed, then threat detection capability is improved, but response time to zero-day attacks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection capabilityVSAvoidresponse time to zero-day attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by autonomously generating policy rules from detected anomalies without requiring human analysis or intervention. When the anomaly detection system identifies a threat pattern, it automatically creates and enforces mitigation policies, eliminating the time lag associated with human response to zero-day attacks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous feedback loops where policy enforcement outcomes are monitored and fed back into the anomaly detection system. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from enforcement results and refine its detection algorithms in real-time, improving response effectiveness without additional human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If network disaggregation is implemented, then system adaptability is improved, but security vulnerability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptabilityVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The anomaly detection system provides universal protection across multiple disaggregated network components. By analyzing packet metadata from various network elements and applying unified anomaly detection algorithms, the system creates a cohesive security layer that protects the entire disaggregated network architecture from threats

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If real-time packet metadata analysis is performed, then anomaly detection accuracy is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential packet metadata fields required for anomaly detection rather than analyzing complete packet contents. By selectively extracting relevant metadata elements and focusing analysis on key indicators, the system achieves high detection accuracy while minimizing processing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250358189A1Systems and methods for network policy enforcement
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 IP INFUSION INC
  • US20250358189A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358189A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358189A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure describes methods, devices, and systems for network policy enforcement. An example method includes, at a router device comprising memory and control circuit, enforcing one or more policy rules at the router device. The method also includes, while enforcing the one or more policy rules, receiving an updated policy rule from a policy server via a policy agent, and implement the updated policy rule by adjusting a data plane of the router device via the policy agent.