Agricultural Machine Row Unit Height Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural machines face challenges in accurately and efficiently controlling the operating depth of tools relative to the soil surface, especially when encountering varying soil conditions and uneven terrain.

Innovation Solution

The agricultural machine incorporates a frame with movable row units, an actuator for adjusting the row unit height, and a ground sensor to provide a ground distance signal, enabling predictive implement height control to maintain consistent tool depth across different terrain conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional depth control mechanisms are used, then the structure remains simple, but the operating depth control precision deteriorates under varying terrain conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating depth control precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of ground distance using sensors (ultrasonic, LIDAR, radar, or gauge wheels) before the row units engage the terrain. This advance information allows the control system to pre-adjust actuator positions, ensuring accurate depth control is achieved before actual ground contact occurs, resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor ground distance and row unit position, the control system processes this data, and actuators adjust in real-time to maintain desired operating depth. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables precise depth control despite varying terrain, while the modular architecture manages system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If manual depth adjustment is used, then the system remains simple to operate, but the productivity deteriorates due to inefficiency in responding to terrain changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment of row unit depths automatically based on sensor data and control algorithms. The actuators independently modify positions without operator intervention, enabling the machine to adapt to terrain changes in real-time. This self-service capability dramatically improves productivity while reducing operator workload to simple monitoring and parameter setting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed depth engagement is used, then the mechanism remains simple, but the adaptability deteriorates when encountering varying soil conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain adaptabilityVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from fixed depth engagement to dynamic adjustment. Sensors continuously measure ground distance and row unit position, the control system processes this data in real-time, and actuators dynamically modify row unit depths to maintain optimal engagement with varying terrain. This dynamic capability provides terrain adaptability while the modular architecture manages complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides the depth control function into independent segments - each row unit can be adjusted individually or in groups based on local terrain conditions. This segmentation allows selective adaptation to varying soil conditions without requiring complex coordinated adjustment of all row units, managing overall system complexity while improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4241546B1Agricultural machine and method of providing implement height control for such an agricultural machine
Publication Date: 2025.05.07 DEERE & CO
  • EP4241546B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4241546B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4241546B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An agricultural machine (100) is disclosed. The agricultural machine may comprise: a frame (202); a set of frame support elements (205) supporting the frame (104); a set of row units (206) mounted to the frame (202) and movable relative to the wheels to change a depth of engagement of the row units (206) with the ground over which the agricultural machine (100) travels; at least one actuator (210) that drives movement of the set of row units (206) relative to the frame (202); a ground sensor (214) operably coupled to the agricultural machine (100) and configured to provide a ground distance signal; and row unit height control logic (276) that is configured to receive the ground distance signal and provide a control output to the at least one actuator (210) to generate a height value of the row units (206) relative to ground. Further a method of providing predictive implement height control for an agricultural machine (100) is disclosed.