Rowing Simulator Drive Mechanism with One-Way Clutch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rowing simulators are complex, bulky, expensive, noisy, and lack the ability to accurately simulate the subtleties of rowing on water, while also being difficult to adapt for different rowing modes and providing inadequate resistance.

Innovation Solution

A rowing apparatus with a frame, seat, outrigger, and drive mechanism that includes a one-way clutch and bevel gears to combine opposing oar motions into a single motion, using a magnetic brake for resistance, allowing for sweeping and sculling modes, and accommodating actual oars for improved realism and reduced maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing rowing simulators use air paddle, water paddle, or magnetic resistance mechanisms, then resistance is provided, but the device becomes complicated, bulky, expensive, and noisy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance provisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the resistance function from complex mechanical systems (air paddles, water paddles) and implements it through a simplified direct-drive magnetic brake system. The magnetic brake provides resistance without requiring large housing structures, variable inlets/outlets, or water reservoirs, thereby reducing device complexity and size while maintaining reliable resistance provision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical resistance mechanisms (air paddles rotating in housings, water paddles) with a magnetic brake system that uses magnetic fields to provide resistance. This substitution eliminates the need for bulky mechanical components, reduces moving parts, and decreases noise while maintaining effective resistance for rowing simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If existing rowing simulators are designed for single mode, then structure is simplified, but adaptability for different rowing modes (sweeping/sculling) is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidrowing mode adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the drive mechanism with universal adaptability to accommodate both sweeping and sculling rowing modes. The system uses a one-way clutch and bevel gear arrangement that can handle opposing motions from one or two oars, allowing the same apparatus to function for different rowing techniques without requiring separate dedicated structures for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability through a one-way clutch mechanism that allows the drive system to accommodate varying motion patterns. The bevel gears can interchangeably engage with different bevel gears on the output shaft, enabling the system to dynamically adapt between sweeping mode (single oar) and sculling mode (dual oars with opposing motions) while maintaining a relatively simple base structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If existing rowing simulators combine opposing oar motions, then single flywheel drive is achieved, but mechanism becomes complex without one-way clutch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive mechanism simplicityVSAvoidsweeping/sculling mode capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a one-way clutch as an intermediary component between the oar cradles and the flywheel. This one-way clutch acts as a mediator that allows opposing motions from multiple oars to be combined into a single unidirectional rotational drive for the flywheel. The one-way clutch selectively transmits torque in the driving direction while allowing free rotation during the recovery stroke, simplifying the overall drive mechanism while enabling multi-mode operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus provides a realistic simulation of rowing on water, is less complex and inexpensive, reduces wear and noise, and allows for adaptable resistance without external power, enhancing fitness and rowing technique training.

Implementation Method 1

the resistance means is provided by a permanent magnetic brake

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS9486666B2Rowing simulator
Publication Date: 2016.11.08 BASIX INT
  • US9486666B2 patent drawing
  • US9486666B2 patent drawing
  • US9486666B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rowing apparatus having: a frame; a seat slidably mounted on the frame; an outrigger for receiving oars; at least one drive mechanism coupled to the outrigger to translate a force applied to the oars to a flywheel having a magnetic break for providing variable resistance; the rowing apparatus having a one way clutch for unidirectional rotary drive of the flywheel, and allowing for operation in a sweeping mode or a sculling mode; and whereby the opposing motions of the oars are combined into a single motion to drive the flywheel.