RRH Backoff Synchronization for Latency in Distributed MAC PHY Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The split of MAC and PHY layers across spatially separated devices in Remote Radio Heads (RRHs) leads to increased communication latency, violating IEEE 802.11 DCF timing requirements, resulting in insufficient InterFrame Space (IFS) time and loss of synchronization between RRHs and Central Units (CU), causing channel access contention and reduced channel utilization efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An enhanced protocol that allows BackOff (BO) procedures to be performed on either the RRH or CU side, introducing a new InterFrame Space (XIFS) to address latency issues and improve synchronization through Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) status alignment, enabling efficient channel access and reduced contention among multiple RRHs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If MAC and PHY layers are implemented on spatially separated devices (RRH and CU), then system flexibility and remote control capability are improved, but communication latency increases violating DCF timing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem flexibilityVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the RRH perform CCA and determine channel availability before the actual data transmission. The RRH counts down the backoff timer and prepares for transmission in advance, ensuring that when the channel is needed, the RRH is already positioned to access it immediately without excessive delays. This preliminary preparation helps mitigate the latency issue while maintaining the distributed architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by allowing the backoff timer to be adjusted and restarted based on real-time channel conditions and CCA status. The RRH can dynamically modify the backoff countdown based on whether the channel is detected as busy or idle, creating a flexible mechanism that adapts to changing network conditions. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to maintain timely channel access despite the spatial separation between RRH and CU.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If BackOff procedure is performed at RRH side, then channel access timing is improved, but synchronization with CU deteriorates due to RTT delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access efficiencyVSAvoidsynchronization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by having the RRH continuously monitor channel conditions through CCA and provide this information to the CU. The CU uses this feedback to adjust the backoff timer and synchronize its actions with the RRH. This feedback loop ensures that both devices remain synchronized despite the RTT delay, as the CU can compensate for the timing difference based on real-time channel status information from the RRH.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the CCA status and backoff timer as intermediary mechanisms that mediate between the RRH and CU. These intermediaries serve as shared reference points that both devices can synchronize on, allowing them to coordinate their channel access without direct real-time communication. The backoff timer acts as a common timing reference that both RRH and CU can reference, enabling synchronization across the distributed system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If multiple RRHs perform BO procedures independently, then channel access autonomy is improved, but channel access contention increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access autonomyVSAvoidchannel utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies merging by having multiple RRHs share a common backoff timer and synchronize their channel access decisions. Instead of completely independent operation, the RRHs merge their timing references and coordinate their backoff procedures based on shared CCA status information. This merging reduces contention between RRHs while maintaining their operational autonomy, as they all reference the same timing mechanism and channel status information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements equipotentiality by providing all RRHs with equal access to channel status information and the same backoff timer mechanism. This creates a level playing field where no single RRH has an advantage over another in channel access decisions. All RRHs operate under the same conditions and timing references, reducing biased contention and improving overall channel utilization efficiency through fairer access distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Data Source

PatentUS20240224323A1Channel access for remote radio heads (RRHS) in which mac and PHY layers are implemented on different devices
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US20240224323A1 patent drawing
  • US20240224323A1 patent drawing
  • US20240224323A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A Central Unit (CU) is connected to multiple Remote Radio Heads (RRHs) over a backhaul. The spatial separation of units creates long round-trip times, which are addressed in the present disclosure. The enhanced operation allows for counting down a BackOff (BO) on either the RRH side or on the CU side. RRHs that perform the BO procedure can resolve the issue of insufficient InterFrame Space (IFS) time for the RRH to obtain Data from the CU and to invoke a BO. In addition, RRHs that perform the BO procedures are able to reduce channel access contention when multiple RRHs are performing BOs, while utilization efficiency for the medium can also be increased by the improved synchronization of BO and Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) status between the CU and RRHs.