Group-Based Beam Reporting Using RSRP Differences

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing group-based beam reporting (GBBR) frameworks in multi-receiver operations do not adequately account for cross-interference between simultaneous downlink transmissions, leading to inefficient and potentially inaccurate beam selection and reporting.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves determining differences in reference signal received power (RSRP) measurements for multiple beams, applying thresholds to assess cross-interference, and selectively reporting or excluding candidate reference signal groups based on these differences to enhance beam reporting accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If group-based beam reporting is performed without considering RSRP differences between reference signals, then beam reporting can be performed with simpler processing, but cross-interference between simultaneous downlink transmissions increases and beam selection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam reporting processing complexityVSAvoidbeam selection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by calculating RSRP differences between reference signals in advance, before beam reporting occurs. The UE determines the difference between RSRP of first reference signal and RSRP of second reference signal, and compares it against a threshold to proactively identify potential cross-interference scenarios. This preliminary assessment enables the system to prevent inaccurate beam selection before it happens, rather than correcting errors after beam reporting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using RSRP difference measurements to inform beam reporting decisions. The UE continuously monitors RSRP levels and calculates differences between reference signals from different TRPs, using this feedback information to determine whether to include or exclude candidate reference signal groups from beam reports. This feedback mechanism ensures that beam reporting reflects current channel conditions and interference levels, improving selection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If all candidate reference signal groups are reported without filtering based on RSRP differences, then reporting completeness is improved, but resource efficiency decreases due to unnecessary transmissions and processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam reporting completenessVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the taking out principle by extracting and removing candidate reference signal groups that exhibit high RSRP differences from the beam reporting set. When the RSRP difference between reference signals exceeds a configured threshold, the UE excludes the corresponding candidate reference signal group from the beam report. This extraction process eliminates unnecessary reporting of groups that would experience significant cross-interference, reducing uplink resource consumption and base station processing load while maintaining reporting completeness for viable beam groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by selectively reporting only those candidate reference signal groups that meet the RSRP difference threshold criteria. Rather than reporting all possible candidate groups (excessive action) or using a fixed number of groups (partial action), the system dynamically determines which groups to report based on measured RSRP differences. This partial reporting approach optimizes resource efficiency by transmitting only the necessary beam information while maintaining sufficient completeness for reliable communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If RSRP difference threshold filtering is applied to exclude candidate reference signal groups, then cross-interference is reduced and beam quality improves, but the number of reportable beams decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-interference levelVSAvoidnumber of reportable beams
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using RSRP difference values as a filtering parameter to determine candidate reference signal group inclusion. The system changes the reporting state of reference signal groups based on the RSRP difference parameter: groups with RSRP differences below the threshold are included in beam reports, while groups exceeding the threshold are excluded. This parameter-based filtering reduces cross-interference by eliminating problematic beam combinations while dynamically adjusting the number of reportable beams based on actual channel conditions rather than applying a fixed reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250287366A1Group-based beam reporting for multi-receiver operation based on reference signal received power differences
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20250287366A1 patent drawing
  • US20250287366A1 patent drawing
  • US20250287366A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for group-based beam reporting (GBBR) for multi-receiver operation based on reference signal received power (RSRP) differences is provided. The method may include determining, by a first apparatus, a candidate reference signal (RS) group to be provided to at least one second apparatus. The candidate RS group includes at least a first RS and a second RS. The method also includes determining a first difference between a first RSRP of the first RS and a second RSRP of the second RS. The method further includes determining a second difference between a third RSRP of the second RS and a fourth RSRP of the first RS, and performing at least one of excluding the candidate RS group from a group-based beam report based on the first and second differences, or transmitting, to the at least one second apparatus, information indicative of the first and second differences.