R-T-B Magnet Composition for Lower Magnetizing Field Motors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The R-T-B-based magnetic material described in existing patents has high remanence but requires a high magnetizing field for magnetization switching, exceeding the limit of stator coils in motors, and exhibits large magnetization variation with respect to magnetic field variation, leading to inefficient motor operation.

Innovation Solution

An R-T-B-based magnet with specific composition and structure, including rare earth elements, transition metal elements, boron, gallium, aluminum, and carbon, with a tetragonal R2T14B-type main phase and grain boundary phases, optimized to reduce coercivity, magnetizing field, and increase minor curve flatness, allowing high remanence and efficient magnetization control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If R-T-B-based magnetic material with high remanence is used, then magnetic flux is improved, but magnetizing field required for magnetization switching becomes excessively high, exceeding stator coil capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic fluxVSAvoidmagnetizing field
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical composition parameters of the R-T-B-based magnet by adding gallium (0.01-5 at%) and aluminum (0.01-5 at%) elements, and controlling the Fe/Co ratio and crystal grain size (0.5-5 μm). These parameter changes reduce the magnetizing field requirement while maintaining high remanence (Br ≥ 1.0 T), enabling the magnet to be switched by stator coil capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If conventional R-T-B-based magnet with high coercivity is used, then magnetic stability is improved, but magnetization variation with respect to magnetic field variation increases, reducing motor efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic stabilityVSAvoidmotor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes composition parameters (gallium 0.01-5 at%, aluminum 0.01-5 at%, Fe/Co ratio 90/10 to 10/90) and structural parameters (crystal grain size 0.5-5 μm) to achieve coercivity of 5-50 kOe. This balanced parameter set reduces magnetization variation (improving minor curve flatness) while maintaining adequate magnetic stability, thereby reducing energy loss and improving motor efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If Sm-Co-based permanent magnet is used for variable magnetic flux, then magnetization reversibility is improved, but cost increases due to expensive cobalt and saturation magnetization is insufficient compared to neodymium magnet

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetization reversibilityVSAvoidcost and saturation magnetization
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite R-T-B-based magnet system combining neodymium (Nd) or praseodymium (Pr) with transition metals (Fe, Co) and additive elements (Ga, Al). This composite structure achieves saturation magnetization of 1.2-2.0 T (exceeding Sm-Co), maintains magnetization reversibility through controlled coercivity (5-50 kOe), and reduces cost by using abundant Fe and optimized Co content (0-50 at%).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized R-T-B-based magnet achieves low coercivity and magnetizing field, high remanence, and improved minor curve flatness, enabling efficient motor operation with reduced energy consumption and increased efficiency across a wide range of speeds and loads.

Implementation Method 1

a remanence reversibly changes by applying an external magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic hysteresis: Magnetic Hysteresis

Implementation Method 2

R-T-B-based magnet containing one or more of rare earth elements; one or more of transition metal elements, including iron, or two or more of transition metal elements, including iron and cobalt; boron

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFerromagnetism: Ferromagnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11837915B2R-T-B-based magnet, motor, and generator
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 TDK CORP
  • US11837915B2 patent drawing
  • US11837915B2 patent drawing
  • US11837915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The R-T-B-based magnet contains one or more kinds of rare earth elements (R), a transition metal element (T) including iron or iron and Co as an essential element, B, an element M that is Ga or Ga and Al, and C. When ratios of the number of atoms of R, T, B, M, and C are set as a, b, c, d, and e, respectively, relationships of 14%≤a≤20%, 70%≤b≤82%, 4%≤c≤7%, 0.009≤d/b≤0.035, and 0.025≤e/b≤0.055 are satisfied. The R-T-B-based magnet includes main phase crystal grains having an R2T14B-type tetragonal structure, and a grain boundary phase including an R-T-M-C phase. When ratios of R, T, M, and C in the main phase crystal grains are set as RMP, TMP, MMP, and CMP, and ratios of R, T, M, and C in the R-T-M-C phase are set as RRC, TRC, MRC, and CRC, relationships of RRC>RMP, TRC<TMP, MRC>MMP, and CRC>CMP are satisfied, and a relationship of 0.07≤MRC/TRC≤0.65 is satisfied.