RTP Video Tunneling Through H.221 Sub-Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of re-determining RTP fragmentation boundaries and sub-headers during video conferencing is computationally intensive and requires updates to conferencing systems when specifications change, as these specifications are modified, leading to inefficiencies in transmitting RTP packets between gateways.

Innovation Solution

Copying the entire RTP packet, including the header and sub-header, into the sub-channel portion of an H.221 frame, which eliminates the need for re-calculation of fragmentation boundaries at the receiving gateway, allowing for seamless transmission without adapting to new specifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the RTP header and sub-header are removed before transmitting through H.221 frame, then the video bits can be copied into sub-channels, but the fragmentation boundaries and RTP sub-headers must be re-determined at the receiving gateway which is computationally intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by preserving and transmitting the RTP header and sub-header information along with the video bits through the H.221 frame's sub-channels. This preliminary preservation of header information eliminates the need for computationally intensive re-determination of fragmentation boundaries and RTP sub-headers at the receiving gateway, thereby reducing processing cycles while maintaining transmission efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the RTP packet is de-packetized and only video bits are copied, then transmission through H.221 is possible, but the system must be updated when specifications are modified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecification adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem update requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by transmitting complete RTP packets (including headers and sub-headers) through the H.221 sub-channels rather than de-packetizing them. This copying approach preserves the original RTP packet structure, allowing the system to adapt to specification changes without requiring updates to the conferencing system, as the complete packet information is maintained throughout transmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Power

If complete RTP packets are transmitted through H.221 sub-channels, then processing cycles are reduced, but more data must be transmitted through the frame

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing cyclesVSAvoiddata transmission volume
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by utilizing the sub-channel portion of the H.221 frame structure to transmit RTP packet data. This segmentation approach allows complete RTP packets to be transmitted through dedicated sub-channels, reducing processing cycles at the receiving gateway while efficiently managing data transmission volume through structured frame allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8094667B2RTP video tunneling through H.221
Publication Date: 2012.01.10 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US8094667B2 patent drawing
  • US8094667B2 patent drawing
  • US8094667B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is provided. The system includes a first gateway operable to receive a real-time protocol (RTP) packet including video data from a first endpoint; and a second gateway operable to communicate with a second endpoint. The first gateway is operable to communicate the RTP packet to the second gateway in a sub-channel portion of an frame-based protocol.