Hybrid RTP Payload Framing for Header Overhead and Codec Compatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for introducing new speech codecs into telecommunication systems face interoperability issues with legacy equipment, leading to increased costs and potential speech quality degradation, particularly in scenarios where frame aggregation is used, and there is a need for an efficient RTP payload format that minimizes overhead while maintaining compatibility with legacy codecs like AMR-WB.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for defining a payload format that selectively uses a payload header based on codec modes and bit rates, allowing for efficient header-less packetization in certain cases while ensuring unique identification of codec modes and bit rates, and using spare bits for additional signaling information, thereby avoiding ambiguities and supporting frame aggregation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a payload header is always included in RTP packets for new codec modes, then codec mode and bit rate identification is reliable, but overhead increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecodec mode identification accuracyVSAvoidRTP packet overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of payload header presence from static (always included) to dynamic (conditionally included). The header is only present when necessary for identification, based on whether the codec mode is interoperable with legacy equipment. This resolves the contradiction by adapting the identification mechanism to the specific codec mode being transmitted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The payload format dynamically adapts its structure based on the codec mode. For interoperable modes, the format mimics legacy AMR-WB without a header. For non-interoperable modes, a header is added. This dynamic structural change allows the system to optimize overhead while maintaining reliable identification when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If legacy codec support is maintained for interoperability, then compatibility with legacy equipment is ensured, but device complexity and implementation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteroperability with legacy equipmentVSAvoidcodec implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary interoperable codec modes from the full EVS codec and integrates them into the payload format. Not all EVS modes need to be supported for interoperability - only specific modes that match legacy AMR-WB characteristics. This selective extraction reduces implementation complexity while maintaining compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The RTP payload format is designed to be universal by accommodating both legacy AMR-WB modes and new EVS modes within a single standardized format. The same payload structure can carry different codec modes, eliminating the need for separate handling mechanisms and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If transcoders are deployed for codec translation, then interoperability between new and legacy equipment is achieved, but network investment and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecodec translation capabilityVSAvoidnetwork infrastructure cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The standardized RTP payload format acts as an intermediary that enables direct communication between EVS and AMR-WB equipment without requiring transcoder intermediaries. By defining a common payload structure that both codec types can use, the patent eliminates the need for translation equipment while maintaining interoperability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If capability exchange between terminals is implemented, then appropriate codec selection is enabled, but additional signaling overhead and call setup time are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecodec selection capabilityVSAvoidcall setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs capability exchange and codec mode selection as a preliminary action during terminal initialization, before actual call setup. Terminals pre-negotiate and agree on supported codec modes and the payload format to use. This preliminary action eliminates the need for repeated capability exchange during each call setup, reducing signaling overhead and call establishment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10535359B2Hybrid RTP payload format
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US10535359B2 patent drawing
  • US10535359B2 patent drawing
  • US10535359B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, disclosed is a method and an apparatus thereof for formatting a payload for transmission of multi-mode speech/audio codec data. The method comprises deciding whether a header-less or a header-full payload format is used for transmission of a coded frame. The decision is based on a codec mode and a required functionality. The payload data is packetized with or without the payload header depending on the decision.