RTS CTS Protocol Rate Adaptation and Frame Multiplexing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems using the RTS/CTS method face inefficiencies due to imperfections in transmission rate determination, difficulty in data unit multiplexing, limitations with delay acknowledgement, lack of selective acknowledgement implementation, and increased overheads in the MAC layer, which affect communication quality and bandwidth utilization.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a wireless communication system that uses the RTS/CTS method with improved access control based on CSMA, allowing for dynamic transmission rate selection based on receive signal quality, multiplexing of RTS, CTS, DATA, and ACK frames, and implementing delay ACK and selective acknowledgement, while reducing overheads by combining these messages into a single packet.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the RTS/CTS method is used with conventional transmission rate determination, then communication protocols are standardized, but transmission rate optimization is imperfect due to inability to adapt to real-time channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidtransmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic transmission rate selection where the receiving station determines the optimal data rate based on real-time receive signal quality measurements and communicates it back to the transmitting station via the CTS packet. This allows the system to adapt transmission parameters dynamically rather than using fixed predetermined rates, resolving the contradiction between standardized protocols and optimized performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a feedback mechanism where the receiving station measures signal quality, determines the optimal data rate, and feeds this information back to the transmitting station through the CTS packet's data rate field. This closed-loop feedback enables continuous optimization of transmission rate based on actual channel conditions, improving both reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If separate RTS, CTS, DATA, and ACK packets are transmitted individually, then protocol clarity is maintained, but overhead increases and transmission efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol clarityVSAvoidtransmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple protocol functions into fewer packets. Specifically, the CTS packet is enhanced to include not only clear-to-send acknowledgment but also optimal data rate information and selective acknowledgment capabilities. This merging reduces the total number of packets required while maintaining protocol clarity through structured information fields.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The CTS packet is transformed into a multi-functional message that performs multiple roles: acknowledging receipt of RTS, providing optimal data rate feedback, enabling selective acknowledgment, and facilitating delay acknowledgment. This universal packet design reduces overhead by eliminating the need for separate dedicated packets for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If immediate ACK is used, then communication responsiveness is high, but bandwidth utilization is reduced due to frequent acknowledgment packets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication responsivenessVSAvoidbandwidth utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements delay acknowledgment where ACK packets are sent periodically or at predetermined intervals rather than immediately after each data packet. This periodic action reduces the frequency of acknowledgment traffic, improving bandwidth utilization while maintaining acceptable responsiveness through the delayed feedback mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Ease of operation

If all data units are transmitted without selective acknowledgment, then transmission simplicity is maintained, but error recovery efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission simplicityVSAvoiderror recovery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements selective acknowledgment where the receiving station identifies and acknowledges only specific data units that were successfully received, rather than acknowledging all packets uniformly. This local quality approach allows the transmitting station to quickly retransmit only the erroneous packets, improving error recovery efficiency while maintaining operational simplicity through targeted feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8274961B2Apparatus and associated methodology of adjusting a RTS/CTS transmission protocol
Publication Date: 2012.09.25 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US8274961B2 patent drawing
  • US8274961B2 patent drawing
  • US8274961B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Access control based on CSMA is favorably carried out with the RTS/CTS method used together.If the RTS/CTS procedure is used together, CTS information is transmitted in response to the reception of RTS information, and data is transmitted in response to the reception of CTS. The CTS transmitting station measures the quality of RTS receive signal, and thereby determines a transmission rate at which it can receive and notifies a station as the destination of CTS. The station as the destination of CTS transmits data in response to CTS information. As the transmission rate for this data, the transmission rate indicated in the RATE field in CTS is applied.