Remote Terminal Unit I/O Rack with Separated Control and Termination Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial control systems face high costs and downtime due to the need for multiple types of I/O modules and racks, as well as the expense of replacing entire I/O modules when damaged, and the complexity of matching incompatible components.

Innovation Solution

A chassis with control modules and termination modules separated via a backplane, where control modules provide core functionality and termination modules offer application-specific conditioning and surge protection, allowing a single control module to be used with multiple termination modules, and enabling electronic keying for compatibility verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple types of I/O modules and racks are used to support different applications, then system functionality and adaptability are improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication-specific functionalityVSAvoidnumber of module types
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The I/O module is divided into two separate modules: a control module containing the processor and control logic, and a termination module containing application-specific conditioning circuits. These modules connect via a backplane, allowing the control module to be shared across multiple applications while termination modules provide specialized functionality for different signal types (analog, discrete, fieldbus protocols).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control module is designed as a universal platform that can work with multiple types of termination modules through standardized backplane connections. The processor in the control module executes software that can be configured to support different communication protocols and signal conditioning types, enabling a single control module to serve multiple applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If entire I/O modules are replaced when damaged, then system reliability is maintained, but downtime and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operational integrityVSAvoidmodule replacement downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the control module from the termination module, the system allows replacement of only the damaged component rather than the entire I/O module. The control module can remain in place and continue operating with a new termination module, significantly reducing replacement downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control module and termination module are combined through a backplane connection that allows them to function as an integrated unit while remaining physically separable. This merging enables hot-swapping capability where modules can be replaced without shutting down the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If surge protection is included in control modules, then component protection is improved, but cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurge damage protectionVSAvoidcontrol module structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Surge protection circuitry is extracted from the control module and placed in the termination module instead. This separation allows the control module to remain simple and cost-effective while still providing surge protection through the termination module's dedicated protection circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The termination module, which contains the surge protection circuitry, is designed as a lower-cost component that can be replaced more easily than the control module. This allows the expensive control module to be protected from surge damage while the cheaper termination module absorbs the surge events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentEP3465366B1Apparatus to communicatively couple field devices to a remote terminal unit
Publication Date: 2021.07.07 BRISTOL INC
  • EP3465366B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3465366B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3465366B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and apparatus to communicatively coupled field devices to a remote terminal unit are disclosed. The example apparatus includes a base rack for a remote terminal unit in a process control system. The example apparatus further includes a first termination module to be inserted in a first termination slot of the base rack. Wires communicatively coupled to a field device are to be terminated on the first termination module. The example apparatus also includes a first control module separate from the first termination module to be inserted in a first control slot of the base rack. The first control module is to be communicatively coupled with the first termination module via a backplane of the base rack. The first control module is to control communications with the field device.