Ruthenium Catalysts for Z-Selective Metathesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current metathesis reactions face challenges in achieving high stereoselectivity and efficiency, particularly in favoring the production of Z-olefins due to the reversible nature of olefin metathesis and isomerization to thermodynamically favored E-olefins, with existing Ru-catalysts typically exhibiting E-selectivity and diminished catalytic activity at higher conversions.

Innovation Solution

Development of new compounds with specific structures, such as those described in formulas I, I-a, I-b, and I-c, which act as Ru-based catalysts with bidentate or polydentate ligands, including carbene and aryloxide ligands, to promote metathesis reactions with high Z-selectivity and efficiency, even at low catalyst loadings and high turnover numbers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If existing Ru-catalysts are used for metathesis reactions, then catalytic activity is maintained, but Z-selectivity is poor and E-selectivity is favored

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestereoselectivityVSAvoidcatalyst performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing ligands with specific localized electronic and steric properties around the ruthenium center. The ligands contain electron-withdrawing groups at specific positions that create a localized electronic environment favoring Z-olefin formation, while maintaining overall catalytic activity through the rest of the ligand structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters of the catalyst system by modifying ligand structure (introducing electron-withdrawing groups), adjusting catalyst loading (as low as 0.002 mol%), and optimizing reaction conditions to achieve both high Z-selectivity and sustained catalytic activity throughout the reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If catalyst loading is reduced to improve efficiency, then cost and waste are reduced, but catalytic activity and stability diminish

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturnover numberVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves high turnover numbers (up to 43,000) by optimizing multiple parameters simultaneously: ligand structure with electron-withdrawing groups, catalyst loading (0.002-0.1 mol%), and reaction conditions. This parameter optimization allows ultra-low catalyst loading while maintaining exceptional catalytic activity and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite catalyst system combining ruthenium center with specifically designed ligand structures containing electron-withdrawing groups. This composite structure enhances catalyst stability and activity, enabling high turnover numbers even at trace catalyst loadings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If metathesis reaction proceeds to high conversion, then yield is improved, but catalyst activity diminishes due to isomerization to E-olefins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction conversionVSAvoidstereoselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by designing ligands that preemptively counteract the thermodynamic tendency toward E-olefin formation. The electron-withdrawing groups on the ligands create a catalytic environment that favors Z-olefin formation from the outset, preventing isomerization even as conversion increases to complete yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the stereoselectivity parameter throughout the reaction by optimizing ligand structure and reaction conditions, allowing the reaction to proceed to complete conversion while maintaining high Z-selectivity. The catalyst remains active and selective even at high conversions where other catalysts fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These catalysts achieve exceptional Z-selectivity (typically >98:2 Z:E) and efficiency, allowing complete conversion at catalyst loadings as low as 0.002 mol% with turnover numbers up to 43,000, overcoming the limitations of existing Ru-catalysts by favoring Z-olefin production and maintaining catalytic activity.

Implementation Method 1

Catalysts for efficient Z-selective metathesis. The present invention provides compounds for promoting metathesis reactions with high stereoselectivity and/or efficiency.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentEP3008078B1Catalysts for efficient z-selective metathesis
Publication Date: 2018.12.19 BOSTON COLLEGE
  • EP3008078B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3008078B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3008078B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present application provides, among other things, compounds and methods for metathesis reactions. In some embodiments, provided compounds promote highly efficient and highly Z-selective metathesis. In some embodiments, provided compounds and methods are particularly useful for producing allyl alcohols. In some embodiments, provided compounds have the structure of formula I. In some embodiments, provided compounds comprise ruthenium, and a ligand bonded to ruthenium through a sulfur atom.