Flexible Rubber Closure with Interlocking Protrusions and Holes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional watch straps and bracelets face limitations in durability, flexibility, comfort, and aesthetics, particularly in sports and electronic watches, due to the use of metal buckles and clasp systems, which increase assembly costs and can be fragile, and existing rubber-based solutions lack both comfort and aesthetic appeal.

Innovation Solution

A flexible rubber closure system comprising two flat strands with regularly arranged holes and protrusions that engage when pressed together, eliminating the need for a clasp and distributing tensile forces across multiple elements for enhanced resistance and comfort, while allowing for adjustable fit and improved aesthetics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a metal buckle or clasp is used to close the bracelet, then the closure is secure and durable, but the device complexity and assembly costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure securityVSAvoidclosure system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closure function is merged directly into the bracelet structure itself. The first strand includes engagement elements (protrusions or holes) that directly engage with the second strand, eliminating the need for separate buckles or clasps. This integration maintains secure closure while reducing device complexity and assembly requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The bracelet strands serve multiple functions: they provide structural support, aesthetic appearance, and built-in closure mechanisms. The engagement elements are formed as integral parts of the strands during manufacturing, allowing the same components to fulfill both structural and fastening roles without requiring additional specialized parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If a traditional mushroom-shaped protrusion is used for closure, then the construction is simple, but the tensile force concentration causes the foot to yield easily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure construction simplicityVSAvoidtensile resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The closure system uses multiple discrete engagement elements (protrusions and corresponding holes) distributed along the bracelet strands. Each engagement element bears a portion of the tensile load, distributing the stress across multiple points rather than concentrating it at a single foot, thereby preventing yielding while maintaining simple construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The engagement elements are arranged in a pattern across the width of the bracelet strands, utilizing the lateral dimension to distribute loads. Multiple protrusions engage with multiple holes across the width, creating a two-dimensional distribution of engagement points that enhances tensile resistance without increasing the complexity of individual elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a loop is added to limit movement of the tip, then the closure stability improves, but the enlarged head exceeds bracelet thickness and causes discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure stabilityVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The movement-limiting function is merged into the engagement mechanism itself. The protrusions and holes are designed to engage in a way that naturally prevents excessive movement and tipping without requiring separate loops or enlarged heads. The geometry of the engagement elements provides inherent stability while maintaining a profile within the bracelet thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If self-gripping materials are used for closure, then the fastening is functional, but the aesthetic appeal and skin comfort are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefastening functionalityVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The closure system replaces self-gripping material systems with a clean mechanical engagement system using precisely formed protrusions and holes. This mechanical approach provides reliable fastening functionality while allowing the bracelet surface to maintain smooth, continuous contours that are aesthetically pleasing and comfortable against the skin, avoiding the textured or bulky appearance of hook-and-loop materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3515228B1Closure device
Publication Date: 2020.12.23 BRASPORT SA
  • EP3515228B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3515228B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3515228B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a closure device comprising two strips (42; 46), namely one strip having a regular array of holes (60), and another strip having a corresponding and compatible array of projections (70). When the strips are placed on top of one another and pressed together, the projections are inserted into the holes which are shaped to receive same, such that the two strips are solidly connected to one another. The strength of the connection is enhanced by internal blocking devices disposed on the side surfaces of the holes and on the corresponding surfaces of the projections. The device of the invention can be used on watches, jewellery, bracelets, belts, wallets, phone cases, or any other object.