Automated Rubber Formulation Screening With High-Shear Characterization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for screening and characterizing combinatorial libraries of chemical and biological compounds are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and wasteful, often requiring large quantities of material, and fail to identify obscure variations that could lead to valuable compounds.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for rubber formulation and characterization that involves providing small samples of rubber in containers, adding compounding additives, mixing under high-shear conditions, and analyzing vulcanizable compositions, utilizing automated machinery and analytical testers to optimize sample processing and characterization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If sequential screening techniques are used for combinatorial libraries, then sample preparation and transfer can be performed, but the process becomes labor-intensive, time-consuming, and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample preparation and transferVSAvoidscreening efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the combinatorial library into numerous small individual samples (e.g., 96-well plates with multiple compounds per well) that can be processed in parallel. Each sample is contained in a separate container or well, allowing simultaneous handling and screening of multiple compounds without sequential processing, thereby reducing labor intensity and time consumption while maintaining ease of sample preparation and transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If large quantities of material are used for screening, then sufficient sample is available for analysis, but material waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial availability for analysisVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates only the necessary amount of material for each screening operation from the combinatorial library. By using small individual samples (microliter volumes) in separate containers or wells, the system obtains sufficient material for analysis while minimizing the total quantity required, thereby reducing material waste while maintaining adequate sample availability for characterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the scale parameter of sample quantity from large bulk amounts to small micro-volumes. By utilizing micro-scale sampling techniques and small container formats (e.g., 96-well plates), the system achieves adequate material availability for analysis while dramatically reducing the total material consumption and waste associated with traditional large-scale screening methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If only the most promising samples are reviewed, then resource allocation is optimized, but obscure variations that might lead to unexpected valuable compounds are ignored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidpotential compound discoveries
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary characterization of all samples in the combinatorial library using automated, high-throughput methods before selective in-depth analysis. This preliminary action provides initial data on all compounds, allowing resource allocation to be optimized for follow-up studies while ensuring that even obscure variations are initially characterized and not completely overlooked, thus balancing resource efficiency with comprehensive discovery potential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient processing and characterization of a large number of small rubber samples, providing data for predicting performance in larger-scale rubber goods production, such as tires, while reducing waste and labor.

Implementation Method 1

mixing at least one of the samples of the plurality of rubber formulations under high-shear conditions to thereby form a plurality of vulcanizable compositions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHigh-shear mixing: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS12479964B2System and method for polymer synthesis, rubber formulation, and characterization
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 BRIDGESTONE CORP
  • US12479964B2 patent drawing
  • US12479964B2 patent drawing
  • US12479964B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for rubber formulating and characterizing, the method comprising (i) providing a plurality of rubber samples including at least three rubber samples each contained within a container; (ii) introducing a compounding additive to at least one of the samples within the plurality of rubber samples to thereby form a plurality of rubber formulations each contained within a container; (iii) mixing at least one of the samples of the plurality of rubber formulations under high-shear conditions to thereby form a plurality of vulcanizable compositions; and (iv) analyzing at least one of the samples plurality of vulcanizable compositions to thereby characterize the compositions of the plurality, where at least one or the plurality of the rubber samples, the plurality of rubber formulations, the plurality of vulcanizable compositions are transferred to a subsequent step through an automated transfer.