Intermittent Contact Tribometer for Rubber Wear Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tribometers require long test durations, often ranging from 50 to 4000 hours, to measure wear and friction properties of rubber materials, which is time-consuming and hinders the development of new materials.

Innovation Solution

A device and method utilizing a rotating disk with intermittent contact, allowing independent control of sliding velocity, dynamic loading, and contact time, enabling faster measurement of friction and wear properties under various experimental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional tribometers are used to measure wear and friction properties, then measurement accuracy is maintained, but test duration becomes excessively long (50-4000 hours)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear measurement accuracyVSAvoidtest duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical weighing method with optical measurement systems (cameras, laser displacement sensors, confocal microscopes) to measure wear depth and volume in real-time during the test, eliminating the need for long-duration tests followed by sample removal and weighing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates optical copies (images, 3D reconstructions, point clouds) of the wear surface that can be analyzed digitally to determine wear characteristics, allowing rapid assessment without physical manipulation of the sample

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If samples are removed and weighed to determine wear rate, then wear measurement is achieved, but test complexity and sample handling requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear rate measurementVSAvoidsample handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement system performs wear assessment automatically on the sample while it remains in the test apparatus, using optical sensors and imaging systems that capture wear data without requiring sample removal, weighing, or complex handling procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If dynamic measuring systems with sensors are used, then real-time wear measurement is achieved, but the system requires continuous contact and cannot easily vary sliding velocity and contact time independently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement speedVSAvoidcontrol of sliding velocity and contact time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs independent motor controls for the friction surface and sample holder that enable dynamic adjustment of sliding velocity, contact time, and loading conditions during the test, allowing the system to adapt to various test protocols while maintaining real-time optical measurement capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement system is designed to handle multiple test configurations (intermittent and continuous contact, varying velocities and loads) using the same optical measurement platform, making it versatile for different wear test standards and research applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3513164B1Device for measuring rubber wear
Publication Date: 2025.05.14 RHODIA OPERATIONS SAS
  • EP3513164B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3513164B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3513164B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention provides a device and method for testing wear and friction properties of different materials under various experimental conditions representative of real usage conditions. In general, the device according to the invention is based on contacting a sample with a rotating disk with intermittent contact, in "open cycle" conditions, where dynamic loads are applied to the sample for the contact to occur. The control of dynamic loading is fully independent of the disk rotation.