Rubber Wheel Core Cleaning Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the tissue industry, large cores with sensitive casing materials are often damaged during manual cleaning, making reuse impossible, and there is a need for a method to restore used cores without causing damage.

Innovation Solution

A device featuring a rubber or rubber-like wheel or hook is used to gently remove material residues from the core, avoiding direct contact with the sensitive casing surface, and combining this with a core cleaner or roll cutter to split and remove the tissue, ensuring the core is restored without damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual cleaning with knives is used, then material residues can be removed from the core, but the sensitive casing material is damaged making reuse impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficiencyVSAvoiddamage to casing material
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical knife cleaning system with an automated mechanical wheel system that uses controlled friction and abrasion to remove material residues. The wheel, driven by a motor, automatically traverses the core surface with adjustable pressure, substituting manual knife operations with a controlled mechanical process that removes residues without damaging the casing material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the cleaning process by controlling the wheel's rotational speed, axial traversal speed, and applied pressure. These parameters are adjusted to optimize the removal of material residues while maintaining the integrity of the casing material, resolving the contradiction between effective cleaning and damage prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Extent of automation

If automatic cleaning is implemented, then cleaning speed and consistency improve, but risk of damaging sensitive casing material increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning automationVSAvoidrisk of damage to casing surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamically controllable wheel system where the rotational speed and axial movement can be adjusted during operation. The wheel's contact pressure with the core is dynamically regulated to remove material residues effectively while preventing damage to the casing material, allowing automatic cleaning without increasing damage risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback control mechanisms that monitor the cleaning process and adjust wheel parameters in real-time. This feedback ensures that the automated cleaning process maintains optimal pressure and speed, removing residues thoroughly while preventing excessive force that could damage the sensitive casing material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If aggressive cleaning methods are used, then material residues are removed more effectively, but the core cannot be reused due to casing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidue removal effectivenessVSAvoidcore reusability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses controlled parameter changes in the wheel's rotational speed, axial traversal rate, and contact pressure to achieve effective residue removal. By optimizing these parameters, the system removes material residues thoroughly while maintaining the casing material's integrity, ensuring the core remains reusable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces aggressive manual knife cleaning with a controlled automated wheel system that uses distributed friction and abrasion. This substitution achieves effective residue removal through controlled mechanical action rather than aggressive cutting, preserving the casing material and enabling core reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method allows for the automatic and gentle cleaning of used cores, maintaining their condition like new, resulting in economic and environmental savings by enabling multiple reuse cycles without damaging the casing material.

Implementation Method 1

The wheel 1 has a friction surface and is advantageously manufactured from rubber or a rubber-like material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10196231B2Method and device for restoring of cores
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 CORE LINK AKTIE BOLAGET
  • US10196231B2 patent drawing
  • US10196231B2 patent drawing
  • US10196231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method (and device) of removing material residues, from cores to make possible reuse of them in the same manner as new and unused cores a number of times wherein cores with material residues in the form of a number of material turns are processed using a mechanism for lifting and tearing the material residues for subsequent simple removal thereof, the mechanism for lifting and tearing of the material residues is displaced along the core and the mechanism for lifting and tearing of the material residues is displaced from a position in on the core out towards and past the ends of the core.