Rucaparib Tosylate Crystal Forms for Stability and Bioavailability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for additional solid state forms of Rucaparib Tosylate to improve processing properties, stability, and bioavailability for the treatment of cancers such as advanced ovarian cancer and prostate cancer, as existing forms may not adequately address these requirements.

Innovation Solution

The development of new solid state forms of Rucaparib Tosylate, including crystalline forms X, III, XII, XIII, and IX, characterized by specific X-ray powder diffraction patterns and particle size distributions, which can be prepared through controlled crystallization processes using solvents like ethanol, 2-propanol, and acetonitrile, and converted into other forms for pharmaceutical compositions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing solid state forms of Rucaparib Tosylate are used, then the formulation can be manufactured, but the processing properties, stability, and bioavailability are not adequately optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidprocessing properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by discovering and characterizing multiple polymorphic forms (Forms I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIII) of Rucaparib Tosylate, each with distinct crystal structures, melting points, thermal behaviors, XRD patterns, and dissolution profiles. This allows selection of optimal forms for specific processing and stability requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite material systems by forming solvates and hydrates of Rucaparib Tosylate with various solvents including ethanol, isopropanol, acetonitrile, toluene, and water. These composite crystalline structures combine the API with solvent molecules in defined stoichiometric ratios, providing tailored physical properties for different formulation needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If high drug loading is required for effective treatment, then the therapeutic efficacy is improved, but the manufacturability and compressibility become more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrug loadingVSAvoidcompressibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by selecting specific polymorphic forms and solvate structures that inherently provide better compressibility and flow properties. The crystalline nature and intermolecular interactions in these solid state forms enable high drug loading (45% w/w or more) while maintaining manufacturability through direct compression or minimal processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the dissolution profile is changed to improve bioavailability, then the therapeutic effect is enhanced, but the formulation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebioavailabilityVSAvoidformulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves dissolution profile modification through parameter changes in the solid state structure itself. Different polymorphic forms and solvates exhibit distinct dissolution rates and profiles due to variations in crystal packing, lattice energy, and solvent interaction. This provides bioavailability enhancement through material selection rather than complex formulation strategies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses solvents as intermediaries during the crystallization process to form specific solvate structures. These solvent molecules act as mediators that organize the API molecules into desired crystal arrangements, which then provide the targeted dissolution characteristics in the final formulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These new solid state forms exhibit improved stability, solubility, and handling characteristics, making them suitable for pharmaceutical formulations, particularly for treating cancers with deleterious BRCA mutations and other malignancies, enhancing treatment efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray powder diffraction: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

Polymorphism, the occurrence of different crystalline forms, is a property of some molecules and molecular complexes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymorphism: Crystallisation

Implementation Method 3

thermal behaviors (e.g., measured by thermogravimetric analysis—'TGA ', or differential scanning calorimetry—'DSC')

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermogravimetric analysis: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 4

thermal behaviors (e.g., measured by thermogravimetric analysis—'TGA ', or differential scanning calorimetry—'DSC')

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential scanning calorimetry: Calorimetry

Implementation Method 5

melting point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 6

changing the dissolution profile in a favorable direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS20250223295A1Solid state forms of rucaparib tosylate
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 PLIVA HRVATSKA DOO
  • US20250223295A1 patent drawing
  • US20250223295A1 patent drawing
  • US20250223295A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure encompasses solid state forms of Rucaparib Tosylate, and pharmaceutical compositions thereof.